Sat. Apr 20th, 2019

When the people trusted in politics and changed the world

Cuando el pueblo confió en la política y cambió el mundo



The French Revolution It is counted a thousand times, but there is always some element to discover or point of view to underline. The French director and scriptwriter Pierre Schoeller He chose as perspective the meeting of the rebellious people with that of a flaming parliament, the National Assembly, which oscillates between complacency with King Louis XVI and the determination to avenge the abuses of the monarchy and the aristocracy with capital punishment, as finally decides the institution under the impulse of the bases.

Sponsored Ads

Advertise Here

Is about
A town and its king
, a film that opens today in Spain and where the essential thing is - says the director - the story of a historical moment in which people trusted in politics and managed to change the world. The public action through its representatives gave great results, he says, because it offered "hope"And possibilities"inventiveness": Something that now could only happen in cases where there is still room to be innovative, in the case of environmental protection policies," Schoeller says.






The policy paid off because it offered hope and possibilities of inventive, says the director

The action of the film takes place in the central years of the Revolution, that is, between the storming of the Bastille on July 14, 1789 and the execution of the monarch in the guillotine, January 21, 1793. In between, the street riots, the king's flight and, above all, the encounters and disagreements of the people with the parliamentarians of the National Assembly.

Making a film of this revolution obviously posed a few challenges. The director points out three main difficulties: the breadth of the subject, which forced to choose a very specific focus; the fact that it is a historical film, with the economic and rigorous demands that implies, and the high number of people and personalities whose presence it had to reflect.





Schoeller He tried to maintain a certain neutrality with respect to some facts that are still present in the collective imagination of the French nation, and in some way in the whole world. That's why the movie has an air of chronicle which accommodates the main and often dissenting political positions, both in the tribune of the National Assembly and in the street.







My image of the French Revolution is that of a star that died but from which light does not yet arrive "



"My image of the French Revolution is that of a star that died but from which light still does not come," the filmmaker says in his conversation with The vanguard when presenting the feature film in Madrid. "I wanted the film to be a reminder of what our ancestors did with such bravery" and led by "enthusiasm" to the possibility of determining their own destiny.

Throughout the film - very choral in terms of its protagonists - parliamentarians are presenting their proposals to the delegates of the various districts of Paris and other departments of France, including many women. The speeches of Marat Y Robespierre, texts that in the chosen fragments are practically the same as how they read them. "Despite the time elapsed, what they say is very close to us," says Schoeller. In short, he adds, those leaders and revolutionaries "were talking to us." Well, they also thought about future generations.







Source link

Leave a Reply