“We are in everyday life”

The CEO of the CEOE, Antonio Garamendi, will not commit to a path of increase of the minimum interprofessional salary (SMI) beyond the rise of this year, which is opposed to reaching 1,000 euros, and calls for an impact on the public contracts

“We are not going to talk about paths when I understand that it is an agreement of the two parties (PSOE and Podemos) and we are in day to day, daily work,” says Garamendi in an interview with Efe, in which he points out that those 1,000 euros are among the Government’s proposals, whose commitment passes because the SMI reaches 60% of the average salary at the end of the legislature.

Garamendi’s statements come hours before the new Minister of Labor and Social Economy, Yolanda Díaz, meets with the leaders of the employers, CEOE and Cepyme, and the CCOO and UGT unions to discuss the new rise of the SMI.

A meeting that will take place at 17.30 in the Ministry of Labor and that will be the one that opens the Social Dialogue in this new legislature of the Coalition Government of the PSOE and United We can.

“First let’s see how long the legislature will last … the issue that we are concerned about is seeing this year what we have to do, next year we will talk,” argues the president of the employer, who warns of the consequences of uploading the SMI.

“What we are moving is that it would seem excessive (1,000 euros), because there is a part of the economy that would not hold it, especially the emptied Spain,” says the CEOE CEO, who meets his Board of Directors on Wednesday.

Garamendi will ask his partners to send him to bring these approaches to the meeting this afternoon and remember that it is a matter that “is a faculty of the Government, after consulting the social partners.”

So far, contacts have been maintained by telephone, explains Garamendi, who will also ask the Government that companies that provide services to public administrations can transfer the rise of SMI in contracts.

“Many (companies) have entered losses as a result of which they have the obligation to increase wages, but they cannot affect it in price,” he says.

Already entering the labor reform, Garamendi asks that everything go through the negotiating table and warns that depending on what is changed can more or less damage employment.

“We think, as the labor reform is, some issues could be touched, but it depends on where it is reached if it could affect employment,” he says.

“Entrepreneurs will hire based on what we see and the security that these changes give us,” he emphasizes.

On one of the first measures that the Government wants to take, repealing article 52.d that allows dismissal for medical leave, Garamendi also shows his willingness to speak, although he is surprised by the “urgency” of an issue that has been in force for 40 years and No one had raised.

“What is not right for us is that we are being blamed (…) we will be as guilty as those in front,” alluding to the fact that the unions have not taken this issue to the negotiating tables, where , on the other hand, claims to deal with absenteeism fraud.

It is also open to see with the unions issues such as the prevalence of the company agreement over the sector, because “it is possible that there may be some case in which some dumping has been generated with respect to other companies” or ultraactivity.

“It must be measured. It is not good that when the term of an agreement ends, it is not good that this agreement is already in place,” he reflects.

On pensions, Garamendi believes that the best is a consensus agreement between all parties within the Toledo Pact, but that will not be a quick matter.

“The agreements, when they are durable, have to be for everyone,” recommends Garamendi, who acknowledges that this also means more difficulty and more time.


Source link