In an interview on Telecinco, collected by Europa Press, the leader of Vox has insisted that the case of the former adviser is “a montage of Podemos” because, as he pointed out, “in the end, whoever manipulated and circulated intimate photos of women was the own “Churches.
Espinosa de los Monteros has expressed himself this way after his party filed a complaint with the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor against Iglesias himself, Bousselham, the lawyer who initially represented both in a piece of the Villarejo (Tandem) case, Marta Flor; and one of the prosecutors in the case, Ignacio Stampa, to whom he attributes six crimes for the content of a private chat between Podemos lawyers in which Flor comments on certain information that he had obtained from the representative of the Public Ministry.
Specifically, the training led by Santiago Abascal considers that what happened constitutes a false complaint, false testimony and simulation of crime – of articles 456 and 457 Penal Code -, procedural fraud, of article 250.1.7º of the Penal Code- -, influence peddling of article 428 Penal Code – and disclosure of secrets, articles 417 and 418 of the Penal Code.
In this sense, the parliamentary spokesman has charged against the purple formation for having been accusing “for years the State” of having created a patriotic police and of the appearance of the well-known sewers of the State.
“If so, they have not been very successful,” he said, later explaining that, if true, Iglesias and other Podemos leaders would never have come to Moncloa. “It is nothing more than an internal plot with relationships between them and what they reveal is that it was all a lie. The only sewers are those of the pigtails,” he settled.