United We can this Friday registered the request to create a parliamentary investigation commission “on the cards black of the emeritus king. “This was announced by his spokesman, Pablo Echenique, who pointed out that these were” events that occurred after his abdication, “so” the inviolability of article 56.3 “of the Constitution does not apply.” Congress has no possible excuse to block it, “he concluded in a message on Twitter. United We can sources indicate that his parliamentary group has notified the PSOE that the initiative was going to be presented.
Anti-corruption investigates King Juan Carlos, Queen Sofía and several of their relatives for the use of opaque credit cards
In the letter registered by the confederal group it is stated that “through the media“they have learned that” the Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office has been investigating, since the end of 2019, King Emeritus Juan Carlos de Borbón and Sofía de Grecia, for the use of opaque credit cards charged to accounts in which none of them would appear as holders ” . Some cards with which “abundant amounts of money would have been paid in own expenses and that of other members of the royal family” among which would be two of the grandchildren of the former head of state.
The letter emphasizes that “the financial movements of that account and the expenses of those cards would correspond to the years 2016, 2017 and 2018, all of them after the abdication of King Emeritus in June 2014.” The data is not trivial. Until now, the Bureau of Congress has systematically rejected any attempt to control Juan Carlos de Borbón. The PP and the PSOE, now with the support of Vox and before that of Ciudadanos, have raised a sanitary cordon around the Monarchy based on the reports of the lawyers of the Congress, which indicate that the inviolability that the Constitution gives to the king makes a parliamentary investigation impossible.
That is why the letter refers to the temporal moment in which the events occurred: after the abdication of Juan Carlos de Borbón. In this case, inviolability would no longer apply, although the ex-king’s appointing before the Supreme Court would. However, on previous occasions when United We Can, alone or with other parliamentary groups, have proposed to investigate in Congress aspects related to Juan Carlos de Borbón after his abdication, lawyers have also rejected him, considering that the facts stemmed from his period as king.
The petition of the parliamentary commission indicates that the fiscal regularization announced by the ex-monarch’s lawyer “would imply the admission of at least part of the fraud investigated by the Public Ministry, and therefore, the recognition of the commission of a tax offense“And he continues:” The sole implication of persons of notorious public relevance, such as the former head of state, in the alleged commission of a tax offense and a crime of money laundering, is a matter of public interest that justifies an investigation parliamentary like the one that arises here. The same occurs with the decision of the King Emeritus to request the tax regularization provided for by the Article 305.4 of the Penal Code, since it would imply the acceptance of many of the irregularities attributed to it “.