February 27, 2021

Thousands of interns demonstrate against precarious public employment

Nearly 3,000 interim workers in the public sector have demonstrated on Saturday in Madrid to protest against precariousness, hiring fraud and abuse of temporality, which, according to the summoners’ calculations, affects around 800,000 people throughout Spain.

Public sector workers from all over Spain, who sometimes chain 300 contracts in a year, have traveled the Madrid Gran Vía to the shout of “! Fijeza Ya!”, To denounce the “free and free” collective dismissal of temporary workers from public administrations, as a spokeswoman for the Collective of Public Employees in Temporary Abuse has pointed out.

They have also charged against the absence of inspections to detect fraud, illegality and abuse, as well as for the lack of an effective national standard that prevents the abuse of temporality, sanctions the public employer and eliminates the consequences on the worker with his stabilization or compensation.

The same spokeswoman explained that they expect that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which must issue a ruling on March 19, endorses the demands of this group, some 800,000 people throughout Spain, equivalent to 30% of Public employees

The figure does not agree with the data provided this week by the Ministry of Territorial Policy and Public Function, which ensures that of the 2.6 million employees in the public sector, only 21.6% correspond to interim, temporary staff and others; 56% are career civil servants, and the remaining 22.4% are labor personnel.

The interim are confident in what the CJEU determines on March 19, although the EU General Counsel who drew up a first opinion that considered adjusted to European law that the abusive use of successive temporary contracts by Spanish public administrations does not is automatically sanctioned with the transformation of the temporary contract into a fixed one

Juliane Kokott’s report, which is not binding, opened the door, however, to compensation for damages caused by a lump sum sufficiently deterrent.

The lawyer advocated adequately sanctioning the abuse of temporality, not only maintaining the place until it is definitively covered with a selective process – as established by Spanish jurisprudence – but also establishing compensation for the affected worker high enough to deter the employer .


Source link