After 11 years of experience in this field, when you receive a communication of this type, you can already imagine what the objective of the person offering to help is. This form of scam has multiple circumstances and variants. In the words of Amills, when the disappearance of a teenager in Spain is published, at three or four in the morning, she usually receives calls from Mexico to inform that she has been kidnapped and that with the payment of 1,000 euros she will be released.
The representative of the NGO asks to avoid that the affected families suffer a ‘double victimization’
In other cases, the caller uses a map on the Internet to give a certain route and, from a point, indicates that he will apply his powers to reach the disappeared and for that service he asks for an amount of money.
For the national representative of SOSDesaparecidos, “all information is appreciated” and it can not be said that, “if you are not sure, do not call; That is an error”. In the opinion of Joaquín Amills, from where he least imagines some valuable information for the security forces can come from. And the job of his NGO is, precisely, to filter that call, based on data that only relatives and friends of the protagonists of the disappearance know. If you fail that test, the information is not provided to investigators to avoid wasting time, he notes.
According to the SOSDesaparecidos spokesperson, there are also messages of “very bad taste to profit from all this.” He is aware that “as the days go by, this will get worse.” And it is that there are also the people who affirm that they have had a dream and are in a position to say where the missing persons can be found; Or four people get together and interpret what they have dreamed of. Amills says that “I have never seen a case resolved in this way.”
The false information and hoaxes generate “double victimization” among the families of the disappeared girls, “which is the most horrible thing they can suffer” at this time, since, in addition to dealing with pain that is not easy to describe, on top of that they have to receive non-verified stories or hoaxes, “which is very cruel.”
“One of our jobs is to filter calls with data that have not transpired,” he says.
He comments that most communication professionals seek to offer the constructive aspect of the situation, disseminate and try to find empathy with the relatives of the disappeared, “since the rest is unnecessary.” As an example of one of these matters that are disclosed without contrast, he mentions the supposed plan of Anna and Olivia’s mother, Beatriz Zimmermann, to go to Belgium with the girls and their current partner, a Belgian national, to keep the minors away from your parent. In Amills’ opinion, on the one hand, this hypothesis provides a justification for the alleged kidnapping of the minors by Tomás. And, on the other hand, it is not contrasted, since Beatriz «never thought about it; He always repeated to Gimeno that Olivia and Anna should see their father, as well as that custody had to be shared.
In the supposed case that this is an episode of parental kidnapping, as there are many others involving people from different countries, Joaquín Amills points out that «nothing indicates that, if Tomás reconsiders out of love for the girls, he will not be able to return everything to the previous situation »To the night of last April 27.