Mon. Apr 22nd, 2019

The veto on transgender soldiers in the US Army comes into force

The veto on transgender soldiers in the US Army comes into force



The Department of Defense of the United States put this Friday in march a new policy impelled by the White House that will prevent the transsexuals to enlist in the Armed Forces, although the measurement still is in the courts in the absence of a firm sentence.

Sponsored Ads

Advertise Here

The Pentagon has been able to launch it this Friday thanks to a decision of the Supreme Court, which on January 22 authorized that this new policy came into operation until the courts reach a ruling.

The Department of Defense emphasizes that its policy is not a ban on transgender in the Armed Forces, but only prevents people who weigh to undergo a sex change operation from joining, and argues that in this way it will allow the Army to "continue being the most lethal and effective combat forces in the world. "

US President Donald Trump announced in July 2017 that he intended to prohibit all transgender people from serving in the Army.

Finally, the defense portfolio presented in March of last year a regulation that established that people with "a history of gender dysphoria (...) are disqualified from military service except under limited circumstances", but did not recommend the expulsion of members of the Armed Forces that had already undergone a sex change operation.

Neither this norm could be implemented since, in addition to generating the rejection of numerous social groups and part of the military estate, it was again blocked by the Justice that considered that it was a discriminatory measure that violated constitutional rights.

The Trump government decided to veto the Supreme Court in November to rule on the measure and argued that the judicial blockade forced the army to maintain a previous policy, even though a report prepared by the Pentagon established that the incorporation into the ranks of transgender "puts at risk the lethality and military effectiveness".

In total, four lawsuits against these prohibitions were filed and several courts prevented the policy from taking effect until the Supreme Court decided otherwise.

.



Source link

Leave a Reply