When video arbitration, used for several years in various sports modalities, landed in the world of football, especially in Spain, many saw it as the solution to the eternal debates about the arbitral errors that generated so much controversy party after game. But joy in a well. The arrival of the VAR has failed to end the controversies.
The grancanario scholar Miguelo Betancor, professor at the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, former president of the Herbalife Gran Canaria, international basketball referee, director of operations and arbitration at FIBA Europe from 2004 to 2012, and member of the newly created Hall of Fame of Spanish basketball, he is co-author of a book that tries to analyze this matter from a multidisciplinary and international approach.
The work is an updated and complete reference that allows to deepen the different aspects that make up the debate on the introduction of video technology to help decision making in sports arbitration.
The book has been edited in English by Routledge, one of the most prestigious in the world in terms of communication and sports, under the title The use of video technologies in refereeing football and other sports –The use of video technology in football and other arbitration sports –.
Next to the grancanario are Manuel Armenteros Gallardo, professor of audiovisual communication at the Carlos III University of Madrid and an expert in new technologies applied to the training of soccer referees and instructors; and Anto Benítez, professor of audiovisual communication at the Carlos III University of Madrid who was the director of sports broadcasts for television.
Three experts in many other key subjects in the use of video arbitration, much questioned in Spain. Miguelo Betancor explains that the VAR “should not generate so many confusions.” “Technology has adapted to all orders of life, and sports too. It is an instrument that gives value to the concrete action of a sport. Its mission must be to reduce the margin of objective error of the referees. Technology does not it must be used to re-arbitrate a game, but it makes no sense.This is about objective ethical decisions, where there is no doubt.The problem is that there is a lot of confusion.That happens because the protocol is not clear.If a protocol is made of what It is reviewable and what situations and moves must be reviewed, there is no problem, “he says.
The grancanario says that the technology must be consistent with certain moves, that the cameras used for actions in the area cannot be the same, for example, those that should be used for offside actions.
Divided into five parts
All these aspects are analyzed through the pages of the book in which Miguelo Betancor participates. The work is divided into five parts. In the first, the debate on the need to approve and launch a VAR model is addressed.
The second is related to the new relationships that arbitration in football will have to address, with the way of production of audiovisual professionals and with the new channels and communication formulas that the VAR team must use so that their considerations are immediately and unambiguously accessible.
The third part of the book is dedicated to reviewing well-established video arbitration experiences in other sports. For its part, the fourth is to define case studies in the different stages of application of VAR in football. In addition to providing valuable data and conclusions for future comparisons, it is very interesting to observe how some aspects are more controversial in some leagues than in others.
The fifth part of the book starts from the inevitability of the VAR and focuses on its consequences on the psychology and future learning of the referees.