EP / Madrid TheUnion of Actors and Actresseshas claimed thatIf there were any dismissals due to pregnancy in the sector, it would be declared "null". This has been revealed after the controversy over the replacement of the actressAina Clotetin the series that he runsLeticia Dolera. In any case, has qualified that can not go to assess the case in particular to "not know it first-hand."
In this sense, the association states that theartistsin public shows they have aspecial labor regulation based on Royal Decree 1485/1985, but that the decree does not regulate the qualification of dismissal, and, therefore, its conditions are related to the Statute of Workers.
So, explain that saidThe statute establishes as null any dismissal during benefits associated with motherhood, as well as that of pregnant workers.
It also emphasizes that although artists have Social Security coverage in all the works, there are some, as stated in the Report of the Subcommittee on the Statute of the Artist and the Worker of Culture, some "gaps and problems"at the time of effective access to these rights, but in no case"in relation to the lack of right"
Therefore, from the unionthey advocate a change in Social Security benefits that "allows for an effective guarantee of the right". Although, regarding the employment relationship, it emphasizes that "the norm is clear" and that "its application does not require interpretations but only has to be resolved through compliance with the Law"
On the other hand, remember that private insurance and civil liability that may be taken by the producers are "issues relating to business risk and never the rights or labor regulation of actresses or actors", and that, therefore, this matter "corresponds to answer to the producers", that they must assess whether there are discriminatory clauses in the policies they subscribe to.