Only the lawyers' questions, the responses of the witnesses and the interventions of the lawyers are heard in the room. Marchena, always quick to remove so that no one gets out of line. No comments are allowed, nor the use of the mobile, not even the gestures. The rule is followed to the letter.
Outside there is a lot of noise. The electoral campaign has begun. Five of the defendants, Junqueras, Romeva, Sanchez, Rull Y Turull, they are in the lists. They have asked to campaign and even hold debates in prison. The lawyer of Puigdemont, Jaume Alonso-Cuevillas, wants to be a deputy for Girona. In Belgium, Toni Comín already going for his third party because he aspires to Parliament European, like the express. And there are developments in other causes by the
They are two realities that run in parallel. At Supreme what happened in Catalonia in September and October of 2017 is contemplated as a still photo; outside the consequences of that episode continue dynamically. Will the walls of the room be thick enough so that both universes do not intermingle?
An organized plan
Members of the National Police Corps parade through the court, with different papers on October 1. All of his testimonies can be summarized in two messages, which are transmitted in a staccato way. One, that the Mossos were disloyal. Two, that there was an organization at the voting points: there was a plan that was carried out to the letter. Something that the agents perceived because the citizens who were in the premises were notified of the arrival of the police and then of simple assistants were transformed into human walls, interlaced, seated or standing, even with the collaboration of uniformed firemen or using as shields elderly, children and the handicapped; passive resistance that sometimes became violent with a single purpose: to prevent the referendum from being aborted despite the judicial order, which is a fact for sedition. Of course, not one saw a single civilian injured, despite the insistence of the defenses in this regard. Matching stories and maybe even exaggerated at some point.
In the room the testimonies are listened to in silence, but outside many things happen. A court in Barcelona is processing the 30 people in charge of starting the referendum. Among them are the positions of the second political link, high ranking officials and executives of the public media of Catalonia. A 17 is charged with embezzlement and a bail of almost six million euros is required, what was spent to lubricate the machinery. The process is one, but its various judicial consequences and all progress towards its outcome.
The crossroads of the Mossos
In the Supreme Court the police insist on their second message: the Mossos, with few exceptions, were at least passive. That, when they did not collaborate. And they say: they collected ballot boxes when the count had already been carried out, that they notified the polling stations of the arrival of the other security forces to close them and that they only saw the regional anti- riot police in one place, to prevent a group of citizens opposed to the call will take the polls. They add more data: they discovered people with the appearance and material of policemen mounted in cars that followed their units, and the license plates corresponded to vehicles of the Department of Presidency of the Generalitat.
Outside, the biggest Trapero presents his allegations before the National Court, where he will be tried for sedition and rebellion. He insists that he remained faithful to the Constitution and that he had nothing to do with the independence plan. In the room he also said it, like other body commissioners. Who will the Supreme Court believe? This is one of the gordianos knots of the subject and that not only is elucidated with testimonies, but also with the transmissions of its center of control and the messages between the controls. Some defend themselves; others throw a shower of accusations. In summary, what the magistrates will say is whether the Mossos promoted the referendum or not; that is, if they were a part of the independence project. Whatever happens, one thing is already clear: the result of the 1-O device is not to throw rockets: only 20% of polling stations were closed.
In and out
Outside the noise follows. Assange, one of the pro- propagandists, is left without political asylum and is arrested in London. Junqueras asks for dialogue with the PSOE. We have 30 trial sessions inside the courtroom. It's been nine weeks. They have declared about 200 witnesses and more than 300 are missing. Then two weeks will be devoted to watching videos, plus the reports that will be long and the last words. It is difficult to predict when the hearing will end; maybe at the end of June. The fact that it is broadcast live favors the proliferation of experts and commentators with all kinds of opinions on any incident, even on the dizziness of an official. It is even used in the campaign who will pardon whom. A campaign in which prisoners can not participate, by decision of the court.
There is always noise around a process, and more with such a singular one. There was also the one with 9-N. On the eve of that trial, relying on the external rumble, a member of the Govern made this prediction to a journalist:
They will not dare to condemn them.
The result is known. In the Supreme Court, a state institution considers the biggest challenge to the State since 23-F. Outside there is noise because of the consequences of the process. Will the parallel realities, the one inside and one outside the court, be mixed? Sometimes, the walls of the courtrooms have pores, but you hear little noise: they are less permeable and thicker than many believe.