April 11, 2021

The PP now says that it wants to “end the revolving doors” and that is why it vetoed the names of United We Can for the CGPJ


The Popular Party has justified this Friday its umpteenth blockade of the renewal of the Judicial Power – which has been paralyzed since 2018 – after give his negotiations with the Government broken last night ensuring that his claim is to “end the revolving doors” in Justice. This has been confirmed by sources in the management of Pablo Casado despite the fact that his head of Justice, Enrique López, is a clear example of those revolving doors that says reject. López was a judge of the National Court and a magistrate of the Constitutional Court before signing for the PP. Now, in addition to being the party’s head of Justice, he is a counselor for the Community of Madrid.

Enrique López, between politics and the courts but always on the side of the PP

Enrique López, between politics and the courts but always on the side of the PP

Know more

After the failure of the talks with the Executive, this Friday Casado met with the Steering Committee of the party where he presented the status of “negotiations with the PSOE” – the PP always considered that party as its interlocutor and not the Government as a whole, for not recognizing the legitimacy of the part of United We Can – to reach an agreement for the renewal of important State institutions, such as the CGPJ, the Constitutional Court, the Ombudsman, the Court of Accounts and the Spanish Agency of Data Protection.

“At that meeting, the PP’s position on the renewal of the constitutional bodies was confirmed. The PP maintains that the renewal must take place to strengthen the institutions and not to weaken them. In addition, the PP leadership has shown that the party wants to lay the foundations with the PSOE to reinforce the independence of the Judiciary as a matter of principle, as it has been maintaining for two years so that in the next renewal of the CGPJ the judges elect the judges “, they have explained from the party.

The popular leadership recognizes its vetoes to the magistrates proposed by United We Can, a veto that led to the blockade that was verified last morning. “The PP does not accept the PSOE’s proposal to allow revolving doors between politics and justice. The PSOE has proposed Victoria Rosell as a member of the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ). The Popular Party does not accept that the current government delegate against the Gender Violence, which is a political office of the Executive, occupies a position as a member for several reasons. The main one is because the PP wants to end the revolving doors between politics and justice. The renewal of this CGPJ must meet the requirement of depoliticization, and no politician can be a member of the CGPJ as has happened up to now “, Genoa 13 ditch.

The “revolving doors” of the PP

The vetoes of the PP due to Rosell’s political affiliation occurs despite the fact that the revolving doors between politics and the CGPJ have been a constant protected by the bipartisanship in recent decades: former deputies, former regional high-ranking officials and even a former minister have formed part of the governing body of the judges, informs Elena Herrera.

The Minister of Justice himself, Juan Carlos Campo, was a member of the CGPJ from 2001 to 2008 (the mandate was extended by two years due to the blockade of the PP to renewal) after having been director general in the Junta de Andalucía. In that same period, the PP placed José Merino Jiménez, who held the same position in the Community of Madrid. In the following term he elected Fernando de Rosa, who had been counselor of Justice with Francisco Camps in the Valencian Community. The former Socialist Minister of the Presidency (1982-1986) Javier Moscoso del Prado y Muñoz also held a seat in the Judiciary between 1996 and 2001. Álvaro Cuesta, current member, was a Socialist deputy and councilor in Oviedo.

But that modus operandi It has not been limited to bipartisanship, but the PNV and CiU, which are the formations that have traditionally entered the distribution, also pulled their own: Margarita Uria and Ramón Camp, parliamentarians of those formations, respectively, sat in the CGPJ of 2008 to 2013. Years before, the former Basque nationalist deputy Emilio Olabarría Muñoz had done it. Another paradigmatic case was that of the former CiU deputy Mercè Pigem, who resigned from the current council after being found on the border with Andorra with 9,500 euros.

Casado also does not accept that Judge De Prada is a member of the CGPJ “because it would be a fraud of law.” “Neither has he been chosen by his colleagues within the judicial shift nor has he collected endorsements for it. A judge who has not been endorsed and chosen by his colleagues cannot access the CGPJ through the back door for the turn of lawyers,” they explain in the PP.

Casado’s formation tries to argue its new blockade in a supposed internal crisis of the coalition government: “When Pedro Sánchez and Pablo Iglesias clear up their internal fights, call us. Sánchez cannot pretend to strengthen his coalition with Podemos at the cost of sacrifice Spanish justice “.

.



Source link