The Police inform García Castellón that he cannot access Dina Bousselham's card as the judge insisted


The agents of the Scientific Police whom Judge Manuel García Castellón had ordered to return to Dina Boussellham's card in case he could find any evidence with which to charge Pablo Iglesias have delivered a report to the magistrate in which they convey the technical impossibility of access the device, they assure elDiario.es legal sources. After García Castellón failed in his attempt to get the Supreme Court to charge Iglesias when he was appraised, the diligence of the card was the last resort of the judge, who has been postponing until now the summons of the former adviser to Iglesias, owner Of the device.

The judge turns a piece of the case against Villarejo into the 'Pablo Iglesias case'

The judge turns a piece of the case against Villarejo into the 'Pablo Iglesias case'

Know more

The report of the Scientific Police is about the expanded expert opinion requested by the judge to determine the causes of the "inaccessibility" to the device and find out when its content was accessed for the last time. The sources consulted add that with the police report no responsibility can be attributed for the destruction of the card. In the work of the Police, the judge came to implicate the Samsung company, which has collaborated with the Body's technicians in trying to access the content of the card without success.

The last correction in this matter from a higher instance than García Castellón came last October. The same Criminal Chamber that had forced Iglesias to return to the condition of injured party in the card case ordered the instructor of the Villarejo case to summon Dina Bousselham, who has spent more than a year and a half wanting to explain in court that she did not feels harmed by the actions of the former second vice president of the Government. The crimes that the judge detects in Iglesias require a victim.

In October, the Criminal Chamber fully accepted the requests of the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor, finally revoking the instruction that the judge had decreed a year ago. A closure of the instruction that was not in absolute terms because the investigation can continue alive. And so it has been, but always in the direction of Pablo Iglesias, despite the fact that the Supreme Court decreed in January 2021 that there was no evidence to charge the politician, as García Castellón had requested.

The judge in the case decided to ignore the line of investigation that led to Villarejo based on changes in the version of Bousselham herself, who came to recognize that there were screenshots of those that had been published in various media, with information from her mobile, which she had forwarded to third parties. In October, the Criminal Chamber, according to the Prosecutor's brief, reminded the judge that information on the mobile of Iglesias's collaborator was also published, which she did not forward to anyone, and that is why she asked her to delve into that circumstance. without clarifying.

The Supreme Court went so far as to accuse the judge, in the order in which he refused to charge Iglesias, of "abandoning various lines of investigation, to advocate a concrete alternative without greater plausibility as a reality." Iglesias kept the card for months that those responsible from Interviú they gave it to him without giving it to its true owner and Bousselham has changed his version about whether he was able to access it when the former leader of Podemos finally gave it to him.



Source link