Thu. Feb 21st, 2019

The phrases with which the Law defends the embezzlement

Las frases con las que la Abogacía defiende la malversación


Behind the intervention of the Office of the Prosecutor on the second day of the trial of 'you procés'It's the turn of the State Advocacy, which reduces the penalties requested by the public prosecutor to between 7 and 12 years in prison when accusing sedition Y embezzlement.

Sponsored Ads

Advertise Here

The Prosecutor's Office has entered fully to rebut the arguments defended on Tuesday by the defenses and has argued before the court that in this case concrete actions are judged, not ideas, and that there was violence because the independence leadership based its plan on three elements: coercive use of the right and the use of violence by "human walls", while placing the Mossos "next to the rebellion". For its part, the legal profession has argued that "there is an attempt to bring this case to the European Court when it is a question of domestic law." There are the most important phrases of this representation.






Rosa María Seoane


The head of the Criminal Department of the State Bar, Rosa María Seoane (left), during the first day of the trial of the 'procés' in the Plenary Hall of the Supreme Court.

The head of the Criminal Department of the State Bar, Rosa María Seoane (left), during the first day of the trial of the 'procés' in the Plenary Hall of the Supreme Court.
(J.j. Guillén / EFE)

"We are not facing a fraud trial."

"The trials are celebrated with all the guarantees"

"Today we are in this room because there have been events that are criminal in the Criminal Code. We hold a criminal trial here. "

"There is an attempt to bring this case to the European Court when it is a matter of domestic law."

"It is the High Court of a State that knows its affairs."

"Irene Lozano did not intend to transfer or project any prejudice, only to point out the imminence of holding a trial. There is no violation of the presumption of innocence. "

"The prosecution has ruled on the impartiality of this court denounced by the defenses. And it has been resolved in a negative way. "







Source link

Leave a Reply