The entanglement of the holiday rent forces the Parliament to postpone, for the second time, its regulation. The Board of Spokesmen decided yesterday to delay for the end of the legislature the ordering of this modality of tourist offer through a concrete modification of the Law of Renovation and Modernization Tourism of 2013, lacking the opinion of the Consultative Council requested a week ago. Nearly twenty associations and federations, including the Federation of Hotel and Catering Entrepreneurs andtourismLas Palmas (FEHT), have signed a joint statement against the bill to understand that it violates market freedom and that you must achieve the greatest political, social and business consensus in this area.
The armed common front against the proposed law, which includes three peninsular associations and one state, believes that the rule, which a priori has the approval of all groups except Podemos and PP-incorporates measures "restrictive and unjustified" in relation to the holiday home. The Canarian Association of Vacation Rental (Ascav), which heads the rejection against this regulation "in extremis", believes that with "nocturnal and treachery" – in reference to the short time remaining for the end of the legislature and the lack of dialogue with the sector- is intended to approve "the greatest attack against the small owners and managers of holiday homes and apartments of the Archipelago with penalties of up to 300,000 euros."
The parliamentary groups now prefer to wait for the report of the Consultative, which is not binding but mandatory, before adopting its final position on a rule that will prevent, for example, rent by rooms (bed and breakfast) when defining as a holiday home that which is assigned "in its entirety".
The FEHT is clear that the current bill establishes "unconstitutionally" as a "general rule" the prohibition on holiday rental, while the admissibility of this activity is relegated to "category of exception to be regulated in the future" through insular planning or municipal ordinances. The member of the board of directors of the federation and at the same time director general of Hoteles Cordial, Nicolás Villalobos, demands the Parliament "responsibility and sense" while criticizing that the bill, which will be finally discussed next week in the last full of this legislature, is "inopportune".
The president of Cecapyme, José Juan Socas, is positioned in the same line. Socas stresses that it is essential to seek social and business consensus and not to regulate an activity that has a significant impact on the Canarian economy "without warning" and "in a hurry". "The most serious is the damage it can cause to families or small and medium enterprises that live in the holiday home sector, we never value everything that is around a measure," he adds. The president of Fedeco, Concepción Cotino, is also committed to ruin this change by understanding that it harms many families who have the income they get from that activity.
In addition to the FEHT, Cecapyme and Fedeco, they have also signed the critical joint statement that Ascav delivered two days ago to the parliamentary groups the Cluster of Construction, Equipment and Services of the Canary Islands (Conescan); the Federation of Tourist Housing (Fevitur), the Canarian Business Association for Vehicle Rental without a Driver (Aecav); the Valencian Short Term Rental Association (Avaec), the Association of Hotel Businessmen of Gran Canaria, Lanzarote and Fuerteventura (AEH) or the College of Property Administrators of Las Palmas.
The hotel and extra-hotel association of Tenerife, La Palma, La Gomera and El Hierro (Ashotel) has set itself apart from this common front. At the moment, they indicate from the organization, they do not have opinion on the regulation that is included in the bill because they are waiting to know the meaning of the report of the Consultative Council.