The Government calls on ERC to negotiate “a point of equilibrium” before the risk of the democratic memory law

The Government calls on the rest of the parliamentary groups to take a “step forward” to approve the democratic memory law at a time when parliamentary alliances have become complicated due to the different position with their usual partners, especially with ERC, which considers the repeal of at least part of the Amnesty Law of 1977 essential so that the crimes of the Franco regime can be judged. “We are already late,” said the Minister of the Presidency, Relations with the Courts and Democratic Memory, Félix Bolaños, in an appearance in the Senate in which he especially extended his hand to ERC.

The keys to the Amnesty Law that the PSOE and Unidos Podemos seek to avoid to judge Franco's crimes

The keys to the Amnesty Law that the PSOE and United We can avoid trying to judge Franco’s crimes

Know more

“Let’s talk, dialogue and seek amendments, transactions and a point of balance that allows Spain to advance and dignify itself. I ask all groups and, in particular, to [Josep María] Reniu that we open a moment of dialogue, “Bolaños told the Republican spokesman in the Upper House to whom he transferred that the Government and ERC” agree on the “ultimate purpose of the memory law so that” international law and the principles of justice, truth and reparation are fulfilled, that Spain ceases to be an anomaly “.

The main stumbling block of the memory law, which is pending in Congress, is the way in which the investigations of the Franco regime are approached. “A central element would be the repeal at least partial of the amnesty law that served to close the door to investigations of Francoist crimes,” Reniu has warned him, who has also claimed that the dictatorship’s sentences are not only null but declared illegal. “The Franco regime was illegal. If you are not capable of assuming that scenario, any other consideration will fall on deaf ears,” warned the Republican spokesman, who also considers that compensation should be increased to the victims that “until now have been limited “.

The Government sees room for understanding regarding the concept of illegality of the dictatorship and recalls that economic reparations have already been made by the State. However, the socialists close the door to modify the Amnesty Law. In fact, within the coalition there are discrepancies on how to interpret the amendment that the PSOE and United We can agree to as a nod to the rest of the left-wing parties in which they describe war crimes, crimes against humanity or torture as “not amnestiable” .

Bolaños explained this Thursday that the amendment does not modify anything with respect to current regulations by ensuring that this consideration is already included in the Penal Code since Spain joined the Rome Protocol. Sources from the socialist wing explain that the amendment sought to “clarify” this legal reality in a law and recall that crimes that were not included in the legal system of the past cannot be judged with current legislation.

The Secretary of State for the 2030 Agenda and leader of the PCE, Enrique Santiago, who has been the negotiator of that amendment by the confederal group, has accused Bolaños of “confusing” with his explanations. In an interview with RNE, he explained that when they talk about ending impunity, they are not referring to “putting anyone in jail” because time has passed and there are many ways to do justice. For Santiago, the victims need a “judicial truth” and “reparation mechanisms.” “That is justice, that is ending impunity and I think that it is not being explained correctly,” he has settled, reports Europa Press.

In his appearance in the Senate, Bolaños has indicated the memory law as one of the priorities of his department. Outside the Upper House, the national spokesman of the PP and mayor of Madrid, José Luis Martínez-Almeida, has reproached him. “It is shocking that with the situation in the country the Government is in the amnesty law,” he said.

In the parliamentary debate, the spokeswoman Amelia Salanueva, assured that the law “does not treat all victims the same.” “It does not recognize the victims of the Republic [ha dicho, a pesar de que el ministro ha señalado que pretende reconocer a las víctimas de los “dos bandos], nor that of the ETA, manipulates history and tries to delegitimize the right by identifying it with Francoism. “” Sectarianism in its purest form and a direct way of questioning the Transition and the Constitution, “has reproached the conservative senator, who has assured that the amendment agreed by the coalition partners is “a scarecrow” and a “legal outrage”.

The PP has complained that there has been no reply in the constitutional commission accuses. “They are bothered by Parliament and the opposition,” Salanueva told the minister, despite the fact that the decision had been made by all the spokesmen except for the PP, as explained by the president.


Source link