The disparity of opinions among the regional councilors augurs a long negotiation for the PAC




The objective is to reach a political agreement on the application of the CAP, which will lead the way for the technicians. This is the objective of the Ministry of Agriculture, but some economic advisers have been cooling expectations. Among them, the Minister of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development of Castilla y León, Jesus Julio Carnero. The Castilian-Leon representative has been prudent and, after thanking the Ministry of Agriculture for the work, has pointed out that “The agreement that is on the table suffers from many uncertainties” and believes that it is necessary to “continue working” in the following sectoral conferences on aspects such as the parameters of the eco-schemes, the definition of ‘active farmer’ or the associated aid.

In this sense, Carnero has made reference to matters such as eco-schemes – “There is no model yet,” he stated – and recalled that it accounts for 23% of direct payments. In addition, he added that redistributive payments also distance them from an agreement. Specifically, how is the ‘professional farmer‘. “We have always asked that it be applied to the most professional farmers,” he pointed out, mentioning the requirement that they have at least 25% of income from their agricultural activity.

Carnero has also shown his concern about the definition of the ‘active farmer’ and that the contribution is introduced in the agrarian Social Security. More favorable has been the counselor on the redistributive payments –From 12% to 10% of direct payments– and on associated aid, it has been considered important that part of it goes to beef, reaching 26 million euros for its autonomous community. “We continue to demand a national program to support sheep and goats”, you have specified. He has also asked not to “alter the status quo” when reducing the payment regions.

For its part, the Valencian Councilor for Agriculture, Rural Development, Climate Emergency and Ecological Transition, Mireia Molla,(Compromís) explained that they come to this meeting with a “bittersweet taste because this CAP does not convince us” and has regretted that the status quo of the previous CAP has not changed. In this sense, he pointed out that the Valencian Community is once again being discriminated against. As an example you have recalled “The maintenance of historical rights” whose debate has considered that it was over. “We do not understand that we have spent two years of debates when we thought in a very large majority that this CAP was going to change the rules of the game,” he explained. Rules that he considers discriminatory, since they make “that the same productions are paid differently in different territories.”

On the other hand, Molla has shown his satisfaction that ‘pluriactivity’ has been included among the criteria for receiving aid in the new CAP «because in a crisis in the agricultural sector, where many farmers They do not see it profitable and are about to leave, it would be a mistake to leave someone out of this CAP ». In this sense, it has valued the contribution of these people in avoiding depopulation and considers that the threat that half of the possible beneficiaries may be left out of the aid has been overcome.

For her part, the Madrid Regional Minister for the Environment, Housing and Agriculture, Paloma Martin, has accused the Government of wanting to penalize the extensive cattle ranching in Madrid. «Livestock, especially extensive farming, plays a fundamental role in the rooting of the population, the preservation of the environment and the boost to rural economies ”, the counselor has argued. Informs Servimedia.

Martín has also demanded that the Government “listen to the sector beef beef, attend to their needs and stop attacking them ”, referring to the latest controversy caused by the Minister of Consumer Affairs, Alberto Garzon.

See them


Source link