The director of the CNI recognizes only part of the espionage to the independence movement with judicial authorization

The director of the CNI, Paz Esteban, has appeared for just over three and a half hours behind closed doors in the commission of reserved expenses of Congress to explain the espionage to people linked to the independence movement. The head of the Spanish secret services has acknowledged that only part of the surveillance revealed by the New Yorker was carried out by the CNI with judicial authorization. The rest, according to spokespersons present, could be responsible for the secret services of other countries or "other State agencies with espionage capacity," according to Gabriel Rufián when leaving the commission.

The espionage to Sánchez points to Morocco and questions the continuity of the director of the CNI

Know more

That continues to be, therefore, the unknown that keeps the Government's partners, including United We Can, "more concerned" than before Esteban's appearance. The Republican leader has thus opened the spotlight on the Ministry of the Interior led by Fernando Grande-Marlaska and which until now had been left out of the controversy. "We are talking about the sewers," said Rufián, who has assured that the situation "is also unsustainable for the Interior." Also the deputy of Junts, Miriam Nogueras, has pointed out that the “Ministry of Defense and the CNI are the tip of the iceberg”.

Regarding the number of judicial authorizations that Esteban has presented, Rufián did not want to say it because revealing what happened in the commission of official secrets supposes the commission of a crime, but he has said that it had already been leaked in reference to the 18 judicial authorizations for the surveillance of independentistas published by El Confidencial a few days ago. The resolutions of the Supreme Court are part of the documentation that Esteban presented in his appearance, in which he did not expressly want to talk about Pegasus on the grounds that the law prohibits revealing the systems used by the CNI. Thus, hardly any information has been offered about the espionage of Pedro Sánchez and Margarita Robles, despite the questions of the parliamentarians.

The spokesman for United We Can, Pablo Echenique, has recognized that the existence of the so-called sewers of the State cannot be “denied”. “We left more worried. What we have been told reinforces the idea of ​​taking political responsibilities”, he stated. The minority partner of the coalition has formally demanded that the Minister of the Presidency, Félix Bolaños, “consider declassifying the information” that has been transferred to the commission.

The conclusion of the PSOE spokesman, Héctor Gómez, is different since, in his opinion, "it has become clear that it has moved within the strict sphere of legality." The socialist has explained that the head of the secret services has provided classified documentation to give explanations about the espionage to independence leaders, but has not clarified how many judicial authorizations he has presented and if it covered all the people revealed by Citizen Lab (about 65) . “We are taking for granted a number of a publication that is not official”, Gómez has defended, who has pointed out that it is “disinformation”. “Much more work needs to be done on the credibility of information sources. It cannot be taken for granted without proof that this is so”, he stated.

The PP spokeswoman, Cuca Gamarra, has defended after the appearance of the director that "the CNI has acted at all times within the framework of the intelligence directive" and "in accordance with current legislation" by having "the appropriate judicial authorizations ”.

That does not mean that of the more than 60 spies that were revealed by the New Yorker they were by the CNI with that judicial authorization. “All the actions that the CNI has carried out in relation to people on that list had judicial authorization. That does not mean that all the people on the list were the object of investigation by the CNI”, he has said.

The PP considers that its expectations have been "fulfilled" by the explanations offered by the director of the CNI. And they have once again demanded that the Government provide the information. "It must be the Government that gives the appropriate explanations in everything that affects communications and interference in their mobile devices," said Gamarra. "It is an issue that the Government made public and it is up to the Government to provide information on these investigations and when they learned about it." “Pedro Sánchez cannot hide behind the CNI. He must defend them from those who attack them”, he concluded.

Source link