The General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) will meet next Thursday in an extraordinary plenary session to “debate” on the “situation generated” after the decision of the Table of Congress – with the votes of PSOE and United We Can – not to allow The governing body of the judges decides on the reform that restricts its ability to appoint judges with expired terms, as has been the case for more than two years. The plenary session, which will be held at the request of the conservative majority, anticipates “adopting the corresponding measures based on the conclusions of the debate.”
PSOE and United We can urgently process the reform that removes powers from the Council of the Judiciary and prevents it from positioning itself
This is the second extraordinary meeting held on this reform, which is the option for which the Government has opted to force the renewal of the body in the face of the blockade of the PP. On this occasion, the plenary session will focus on the negative response that the CGPJ has obtained from the claims it agreed on on December 17, when sixteen of the 21 members of the Plenary – eleven conservatives and four progressives, plus the president, Carlos Lesmes – They agreed to ask Congress to collect their report and that of the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe before approving that proposal. The other five members, all from the progressive minority, called for the Council’s resignation en bloc to force its renewal.
The Organic Law of the Judicial Power establishes in its article 561.1 that the draft laws and general provisions that deal with modifications of the norm that regulate the Judicial Power will be submitted to the CGPJ. However, this reform has been proposed as proposition of law of the parliamentary groups of PSOE and United We Can, a modality that does not require that prior control. The Board of Congress agreed on January 13 to reject that request, which had also been made by the PP.
In that same meeting, the governing body of the Chamber also agreed to the urgent processing of this reform, which implies reducing all deadlines by half. This reform, backed by the reinforced majority of the investiture, aims to prevent an interim Council from making discretionary appointments such as those he plans to continue doing in the plenary session on January 28. There are already 61 since December 2018, when his term expired.