Canary Islands hopes to expand limitation of the maximum number of people in family gatherings until the end of August. This was indicated by the spokesman for the regional Executive, Julio Pérez, after the extraordinary meeting of the Governing Council on Wednesday, which explains that this modification will be requested to the Superior Court of Justice of the Canary Islands (TSJC).
Pérez recalls that this body has already agreed to maintain the low minimal encounters once the state of alarm ended and he trusts that this time he will again support the Government’s proposal. Specifically, if the TSJC again endorses this restriction, in the Canary Islands no more than ten people will be able to meet on those islands that are at level 1; of six in which they are in level 2 and of four in the case of levels 3 and 4, except in the case of cohabitants.
After the last judicial blows, related to the curfew, the Government of the Archipelago is somewhat more optimistic with this measure. According to the argument of the Government spokesperson, on the one hand it is based on the reports on the evolution of the pandemic, both in infections and in accumulated incidence, in addition to taking into account the “worrying” situation reported by Public Health technicians regarding the occupation of hospital beds and ICUs as well as its effects on the functioning of the health system. “In addition, we have included in the petition to the TSJC reports from the security forces about the control of these types of meetings,” said Pérez.
Precisely, in this regard, he explained that the agents will be asked to intervene in all meetings that exceed the maximum allowed in public spaces, although he admitted that “control is practically non-existent in private spaces.” “We will not enter anyone’s houses, but abroad his thing is that the encounters between non-cohabitants are not overcome “.
“It is true that a significant part of the infections occur in private spaces, but there are other areas in which outbreaks are registered,” acknowledged the government spokesman, before insisting that the restriction on the maximum number of people in meetings social and family “is one of the most effective, although to deal with the disease what has the most effect is the set of various measures.”
In fact, Julio Pérez reiterated that one of the restrictions that is most beneficial against the disease is the limitation of mobility at night, a curfew whose request by the Canary Islands Government was yesterday rejected by the Supreme court (TS). Regarding the refusal of the High Court, the regional official justified that “perhaps we have gone further than other autonomous communities and that is why this comparison arises”, since according to his argument “in the Canary Islands the idea is before falling over the precipice, try not to get closer “.
“Other regions have asked for a curfew at lower alert levels than in the Canary Islands and with an accumulated incidence of up to a thousand cases and we are asking for it with a hundred”, reiterated Pérez, who recalled that in the Archipelago “the incidence has always been lower than in the rest of the country but we have tried to get ahead of the measures. ”
To this is added that among the arguments used by the Supreme Court to decline the curfew in the Canary Islands is that it is grouped for an entire island while in the rest of the autonomous communities it has been requested for certain municipalities. “Understanding that it allows to act better against the disease, perhaps more presentable grouping by regions,” commented the spokesman for the Government of the Canary Islands, who recalled that, given the possibility of this refusal, at least it was allowed to be authorized for municipalities with an incidence of more than one hundred cases, “but they said the figure was very low.”
With that “desire” to implement measures to contain the pandemic Before the data on infections and healthcare pressure worsen in the health system, the request to increase the maximum number of people for meetings before the TSJC, a body from which the Government expects its endorsement on this occasion, is also based. “They already supported it in May and the data now is worse than at that time,” said the government spokesman.