The State Attorney General’s Office has opened a “preliminary information procedure” to analyze the “very serious facts” revealed by the Supreme Court prosecutor, Luis Navajas, who assured this Monday that two fellow prosecutors of the High Court “ideologically contaminated” they tried to “influence” him on how it had to act in relation to the complaints filed against the Government for the management of COVID-19, tax sources have advanced to elDiario.es.
The prosecutor who asked to reject the complaints against the Government for the management of COVID-19 accuses two colleagues of trying to “influence” his decision
The proceedings will investigate the alleged pressures revealed by Navajas, who is number two for Dolores Delgado, and will try to find out if the facts are worthy of a disciplinary file. The internal investigation will be carried out by the chief prosecutor of the Fiscal Inspection, Fausto Cartagena, an independent position from the State Attorney General.
In a lengthy report released a week ago, Navajas asked reject a score of complaints directed against members of the Government considering that it is not possible to attribute to the Executive the thousands of crimes of homicide or injuries that some of the plaintiffs impute to them, Vox among them, and described as “suitable or, at least, reasonable” their management during the pandemic.
This decision generated a certain commotion in the institution and some prosecutors – under anonymity – criticized it in the media. This fact outraged Navajas, who is close to retirement, and who in recent days has not hesitated to charge against some of his colleagues. The prosecutor has specifically cited Consuelo Madrigal, who was state attorney general between 2014 and 2016, appointed by Mariano Rajoy, as one of the people who, along with another prosecutor that she has not identified, went to her office to “advise and influence her. ”On how it should address the twenty complaints filed.
Madrigal, who was one of the four prosecutors of the procés, published an article last May in The world in which he censored certain government decisions and questioned the use of the state of alarm during the pandemic. “With this troop I cannot go to war,” Navajas assured. In this way, he justified that a Board of Chamber Prosecutors, the highest advisory body of the race, was not held to debate the report on the complaints as requested by the conservative and majority Association of Prosecutors.