Tue. Jul 16th, 2019

Technological giants pay less taxes in Spain despite earning more | Economy

Technological giants pay less taxes in Spain despite earning more | Economy

Getting large corporations to pay taxes where they do business is as difficult as catching water in a colander. This is repeatedly demonstrated by the accounts of these multinationals. Those corresponding to 2017 reveal that it was a great year for your business in Spain. The Spanish affiliates of Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft declared net profits of 36.3 million, representing an increase of 11% over the previous year. However, they paid less taxes. They paid the Spanish tax authorities 31.7 million euros in corporate tax, 8% less than the previous year, when they liquidated 34.4 million euros, according to the data of the annual accounts deposited in the Mercantile Registry.

Sponsored Ads

Advertise Here

Digital business The activity of these companies is based on the digital economy, the use of data, advertising on-line or intellectual property, and make the current tax fabric obsolete. Not only in Spain, but throughout the world. Where is a company doing business on the Internet? Where is it located or where does it generate business? Or perhaps where does it add value? And Apple, where should you pay the taxes? Where do you manufacture, where do you design, in the country that innovates or in which you sell your devices? These questions generate doubts that multinationals take advantage of to pay less.

How do they do that? The strategy that these technological giants are still in Spain It is similar to the one used in other countries. The European Commission and organizations such as the OECD have shown their concern about the holes through which the digital economy escapes. Basically, these companies transfer the bulk of their profits to countries with a more beneficial tax treatment, such as Ireland, the Netherlands or Luxembourg. To do this, they establish their European headquarters in these countries and from them the subsidiaries of the rest of the countries hang. These local branches only act as intermediaries or commission agents, they charge for the support services they provide to the parent company, which is the one that actually sells. Therefore, most of the benefits remain in the Irish nurse.


Millions of euros

Source: Annual accounts of companies. Commercial Registry.

Another strategy is to transfer the rights of intellectual property (the technology of some products) to a group company located in a country with tax advantages, for example, in Ireland. This company would act as the center of business in Europe and would cede the technology to other subsidiaries of the group in European countries in exchange for charging some rights (royalties) with little margin. In this way, the matrix can increase the income in Ireland at the expense of reducing them in the rest of the countries.

In a similar way, Google moved 20,000 million euros of profits from its European subsidiaries through a Dutch branch to Bermuda Island to avoid paying taxes. This way of acting has aroused misgivings in Bruseas, who has hardened his position on the technological giants. In 2017, Apple was condemned by the European Commission to pay some 13.2 billion euros to Ireland for tax aid granted, which Brussels considers unfair. The community executive has also forced Amazon to return 250 million to Luxembourg for benefiting from tax agreements that violated EU legislation.

Real income. These strategies are one of the reasons why GAFAM only declare income in Spain for about 1,000 million, despite the fact that the real business they obtain in our country is much higher. To try to approximate the real number of income in Spain, it would be necessary to start from the global turnover of these multinationals: some 594,000 million euros in 2017, according to Bloomberg. If we apply the percentage of Spain's weight in world GDP (1.69%) to that total, we would obtain an approximate figure of real sales: about 10,000 million - a study by Netquest consultancy estimates that only Amazon would obtain income in the Spanish market for 4.200 million-.

About 200 million less in taxes. To calculate the gross profit, the current margin of the subsidiaries of these groups in Spain (about 7% of the turnover) could be applied. And if we tax this amount with the tax rate of 25% of corporation tax, the technological giants should pay the Spanish treasury more than 200 million, compared to the 30 million that they pay at present. Other less conservative calculations raise the taxes that GAFAM fail to pay up to just over 500 million a year.

Although they do it legally, they squeeze national legislation to take advantage of the nooks and crannies. This action has aroused some discomfort in public opinion. For this reason, the Spanish Tax Agency has been trying to tighten these multinationals for years. It has inspected from top to bottom to Apple, Google and Microsoft and Facebook. And although it has scratched a good pinch, the result of the annual liquidations is still ridiculous compared to the real benefits that these companies get with their business in Spain.

Even so, as a result of the inspections of the Treasury, these companies paid in 2017 a good amount for the back taxes.

Manzana. The apple group, for example, disbursed almost 15 million after a review of the Treasury on the liquidations of corporate tax, VAT and IRPF of several years, according to the memory deposited in the Registry. Apple has two subsidiaries in Spain: one deals with stores (the Apple Store) and the other manages sales to department stores and shopping centers. Last year they declared a joint benefit of only 7.1 million, after paying 13.5 million in taxes.

Microsoft The case of Microsoft is more significant. The Spanish delegation of the company founded by Bill Gates paid last year 11.9 million euros to the Treasury for a historic claim by the Treasury on the corporate tax of 2004 and 2005. The liquidation came after a long fight in the courts. In view of the result, the management of Microsoft tries to negotiate with the Treasury, through a friendly procedure, to shelve another of the disputes with the Tax Agency in the amount of 18.66 million. The management of the company announced in 2017 that it would change the tax scheme to stop paying taxes from Ireland and to do so in Spain. That year he declared profits of 11.6 million after paying 6.8 million in taxes.

Google. The rest of the technological groups have also received the visit of the inspectors of the Tax Agency. In the summer of 2016, a team of 35 tax inspectors broke into the Google headquarters in Spain in search of evidence of tax fraud. The following year the treasury also carried out another operation on the most used search engine in the world. As a result of this action, Google, whose main business is the sale of advertising, paid just over three million euros to regularize corporate tax between 2011 and 2015. In its annual accounts, where it barely provides details of its tax litigation, acknowledges that it still has outstanding accounts with the Treasury for VAT from 2015 to 2017 and companies for the last two years.

Facebook. The social network has a subsidiary in Spain that adds two years recording losses. Most of his advertising business moves him to Ireland. The Spanish delegation only acts as an assistant for marketing and advertising activities. In 2017 it declared income for only 10.1 million in Spain for which it paid 266,000 euros to the Treasury.

Amazon Amazon says it has been paying taxes since 2015 for its business in Spain. I used to do it from Luxembourg. It operates through four subsidiaries: Amazon Web Services Spain, Amazon Spain Services, Amazon Spain Fulfillment and Amazon Online Spain. In addition, it relies on another branch, Amazon EU Sarl, based in Luxembourg, to concentrate the bulk of its business in Spain. As this branch does not present accounts in Spain, its income is not public.

The fiasco of the 'Google rate'
and the OECD crusade

The European Commission has shown on several occasions its concern about the tax strategies of global technology. To try to contribute more to the public coffers of the countries where they do business proposed in 2017 the creation of a tax on digital services, which was popularly called Google rate.

Some countries such as France, Italy or the United Kingdom have decided to launch this new tax, intended to tax with 3% companies with an overall turnover of more than 750 million euros, and an income in the country where tax is higher than 50 million. The tax was destined to the business of online advertising, intermediation and the sale of data.

Spain also works on a tax of these characteristics. In fact, the Government of Pedro Sánchez approved it in the Council of Ministers, but the early announcement of elections and the dissolution of the Cortes have meant that the legal text has declined. The Executive of Sanchez, nevertheless, assures that if it manages to form a Government after the next elections of the 28-A, it will return to approve it.

Brussels has tried that the tax on the technological giants is not only approved in a handful of countries, but that it is a tribute at European level. But a group of countries led by Ireland and the Nordic countries blocked the attempt earlier this month.

In parallel, the OECD, the organism formed by the richest countries in the world, is working on a project to harmonize taxes and cover the gaps through which the collection escapes. Baptized as BEPS (erosion of tax bases and transfer of benefits, in its acronym in English) contains a chapter on a digital tax for GAFAM. But it is still in the study phase and a minimum text is not expected until 2020.


Source link

Leave a Reply