The Ministry of Health has notified 10,328 new cases of coronavirus in Spain this Tuesday, of which 2,202 have been diagnosed in the last week. This figure remains in the line of 10,519 on Friday, when there had been a rebound after the 7,955 cases reported on Thursday. This Monday the 20,000 new cases during a weekend, after the previous two weeks below.
In total, since the pandemic began, 1,762,212 people have been infected in Spain and today the incidence is 198.8 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in the last 14 days, five points more than the previous day.
Since this Monday, the autonomous communities have notified Health 388 new deaths. In total, since March, 48,401 people have died of coronavirus, 773 of them in the last week.
By communities, the ones with the most new cases included in the total balance are the Valencian Community, with 2,841; Madrid, with 2.004; Catalunya, with 1,812; Castilla-La Mancha, which has 616; and Andalusia, which incorporates 601 new infections. The one that increases the incidence the most is the Valencian Community, which has risen 35 points compared to yesterday’s balance, to 227 cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Madrid, which in recent days had an upward trend in this parameter, continues to rise, to an index of 237, ten points more than yesterday. Balearic Islands, which this Monday announced new restrictions, also continues to rise. In this case, it has been eleven points, up to 291.
This same Tuesday, the results of the second national seroprevalence study were released, showing that 9.9% of the Spanish population has antibodies against the coronavirus. In absolute terms, there would be about 4.7 million people of which, according to the director of the Carlos III Health Institute, Raquel Yotti, half would correspond to the first wave and the other half, to the second.
Yotti indicated during the press conference that 60% of coronavirus cases are currently being detected in Spain. That is, 6 out of 10 people who have the virus, compared to 1 in 10 in the first wave. This improvement in the detection rate, he explained, is due to “an effort in detection and diagnostic techniques.”