Several opponents win the pulse of the National Police on how to write "LGTBI"

The Justice has given the reason to five applicants to the National Police who were left out for allegedly misspelling words like “cyber attack”, “redact” or the acronym “LGTBI”. The Superior Court of Madrid has ordered that several applicants in the 2019 call can repeat the tests but with the approved spelling and, if they are finally selected and pass all the tests, they must join as policemen in the position that would have corresponded to them, informed legal sources.

Opponents of the National Police denounce the "regrettable" evidence in Granada: "disorganization", "people urinating on themselves" and "stress"

Know more

The ruling of the TSJM explains that the nine appellant men and women appeared for a call in 2019 to enter the National Police. All passed the physical and knowledge tests but failed the spelling test, ultimately excluded. The reason: according to the court, they had not correctly identified some misspelled words based on what the dictionary of the Royal Academy of Language collects: "cyber attack", "reedit", "LGTBI" and "preeminent". They did not reach the cutoff mark of 6.20 points.

The seventh section of the contentious has given the reason to the applicants, represented by the lawyer Ángel Galindo. He does concede that the Police had the right to put the court note where it seemed correct, but he also understands that the words for which the applicants were suspended were correctly written. And he does so based, precisely, on the fact that the call asked to have the RAE dictionary “as a base”. A total of 100 questions to answer in eight minutes indicating whether the word was misspelled or spelled correctly.

The TSJM explains that the RAE dictionary is not only "a compendium of the correct words and letters in the Spanish language" but that "it does not exclude that other variants not collected but perfectly valid are correct" based on the latest edition of the Spelling of the Spanish Language of 2010.

The judges are based on a report from the RAE's "Spanish Up to Date" department contributed to the procedure to agree with the applicants. As for the words “preeminent” and “reedit”, the report indicates that they are unusual but that “they must be considered orthographically valid”. On “cyber attack” it indicates that it does not appear in the dictionary but that it is also a valid way of describing a computer attack.

About the initials of the LGTBI collective, he says emphatically that it is a word "fully correct for all purposes, also from the orthographic point of view". These acronyms are correct, he says, and their documentation in current use "is very abundant" even if it does not appear as such in the dictionary.

The report, say the judges, is "sufficiently clear and precise" and leads to agree with the nine applicants who appealed. "It would be complete nonsense for us to consider the spellings analyzed to be incorrectly written words when the RAE, the highest institution that guarantees correctness in the use of our common language, has unequivocally indicated that they were correctly written words," say the judges to estimate the recourse for aspiring police officers.

“Thousands were left out”

Ángel Galindo is the lawyer who has brought and won this lawsuit before the Superior Court of Justice of Madrid. He believes that this sentence opens the door for other applicants who were left out because of the spelling tests to appeal their case. “All those applicants who did not apply in their day can apply now. And there are thousands who were illegally left out trusting the Police”, said the lawyer from Madrid.

🔴Improvement of selective access processes to the National Police

➖The #orthography as a selection test

➖The maximum number of candidates in the knowledge test will be determined

➖El income to Inspector by #opposition free keeps the language voluntary

— National Police (@police) February 9, 2022

Spelling tests for access to the National Police have generated controversy and complaints in recent years and it was the Police itself that took the initiative shortly before this sentence was known. In February of this year the body announced that “spelling will be eliminated as a selection test”. The ministerial order signed by Fernando Grande-Marlaska, indeed, does not include any proof of spelling.

Source link