The Real Madrid, the FC Barcelona and Juventus, the three clubs of the 12 founders of the European Super League that are still in the project, have denounced the “unacceptable pressure and threats” to which the UEFA since they announced the competition, and stressed the “incoherent position” of the other nine clubs, in addition to ensuring that they will “persevere in the search for solutions.”
“The founding clubs of the Superliga have received -and continue to receive- pressure, threats and offenses to abandon the project and their responsibility and right to provide solutions to the ecosystem of football through concrete proposals resulting from constructive dialogue. This is unacceptable in a state of law, “says the joint statement of the three entities.
In addition, they recall that the courts “have already ruled” on the Super League project ordering FIFA and UEFA “to abstain while the judicial procedure is being processed from carrying out any action that may penalize the founding clubs or that goes against the Super League. “.
The three clubs recall that the Super League project was designed to “provide solutions to the unsustainable situation currently facing the football family.” In this sense, they acknowledge their “deep concern at the current socioeconomic situation”, making it “essential” to undertake structural reforms.
In this sense, they explain that when they announced the creation of the Super League they announced the “will” to establish a communication channel with UEFA and FIFA, everything “from the utmost respect to the current structures of football and its ecosystem”. “The founding clubs expressly agreed that the Super League would only take place if said competition was recognized by UEFA and / or FIFA or if it was recognized as a competition compatible for all purposes with the continuity of the founding clubs in their respective national competitions. However, , UEFA and FIFA have refused to establish any adequate communication channel, “they indicated.
All this in order to “provide financial stability to the entire European football family”, affected “due to a deep crisis that threatens the survival of many clubs”. “Proof of this, the commitment assumed by the Super League to pay annual solidarity payments that materially multiply those offered by UEFA, and the obligation to reinforce the rules of financial sustainability by creating a clear, transparent and effective control system verified by experts, “they explained.
They also point out that the Super League was understood by the 12 founding clubs as “a unique opportunity” to offer fans “the best possible show and increase global interest in sport”, that he faces “new generational trends that threaten his future.” “On the other hand, it also had as a primary objective to promote women’s football globally, a historic opportunity for its promotion,” they pointed out.
“We are fully aware of the diversity of reactions, in very diverse areas, that the Superliga initiative has produced and, consequently, of the need to reflect on the reasons that have generated these reactions and reconsider the proposed approach as necessary. However, we would incur serious irresponsibility if, being aware of the needs and systemic crisis of the football sector, we abandoned our mission to provide effective and sustainable solutions and answers to the issues that threaten football, “they said.
“We deeply regret that our friends and founding partners of the Superliga project find themselves immersed in an incoherent – and inconsistent – position after assuming certain commitments with UEFA yesterday. However, given that the material problems that led to the 12 clubs to announce the Super League a few weeks ago have not disappeared, we reiterate that, out of respect for our history, for our responsibility to our partners and fans, for the financial sustainability of sport and for the good of football, we have a duty to act responsibly and to persevere in finding solutions, despite the unacceptable pressure and threats that we continue to receive from UEFA. “they warned.
Finally, they insist on their “commitment and firm will to debate”, “without totally intolerable pressure and with respect for the rule of law, the most appropriate solutions for the sustainability of the entire football family.”