Pedraz files the investigation against Mario Conde for money laundering because he sees no evidence of crime

Pedraz files the investigation against Mario Conde for money laundering because he sees no evidence of crime


MadridUpdated:

The judge of the National Court Santiago Pedraz has provisionally filed the case open to Mario Conde for money laundering, eight crimes against the Treasury, criminal organization and continued crime of frustration of execution. The instructor considers that the perpetration of crimes has not been duly justified that the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor attributed to him in the complaint filed against the former president of Banesto.

ANDIn that letter, the Prosecutor's Office assured that Conde directed a group of people composed of relatives, employees, friends and related, during the past 17 years they would have managed to place, conceal and repatriate amounts of illicit origin. With these operations, in the name of third parties, Conde tried to avoid, according to the Public Prosecutor's Office, the confiscation of farms that, by virtue of the convictions of Banesto and Argentia Trust, should be exercised.

The prosecutor typified the facts as a money laundering activity from the misappropriations that Conde made against the coffers of Banesto's entity. Likewise, the Public Prosecutor's Office attributed eight crimes against the Public Treasury in relation to defrauded Company Tax payments for the years not prescribed for the years 2011 to 2013 of the companies Barnacla, Black Royal OAK and Oleificio Español SA.

After all the proceedings, the judge concludes that the money investigated does not have a relevant origin for the process because "it would be prior to Banesto", as well as the designated judicial expert has ratified. The judge explains that the rogatory commission sent to Switzerland to request the documentation bank on the accounts and movements made by the former banker in Swiss entities, concludes that they come from various revenues made between 1980 and 1985, related to the sale of Antibiotics and income from a real estate investment in London, accrued between 1994 and the end of 2009. The expert confirmed in his appearance before the court that the funds raised coincided with the funds transferred prior to the years investigated by the Spanish Justice.

Neither does it consider the crimes against the Public Treasury or the criminal organization to be accredited because there is no "criminal purpose", so the dismissal of the others investigated also proceeds.

.



Source link