British women who in recent years have seen trapped by forced marriages abroad – after his transfer to a second country of family origin, either by force or with tricks – but ended happily rescued by his government has a pending bill. The Foreign Office (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) It requires these victims to cover the cost of the assistance operation involving flights, subsistence, diplomatic efforts and, apparently, very little consideration for the human drama involved in the matter.
"Incredible" and "immoral" are the epithets dispensed by the opposition against the Foreign Office (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) after the revelations of the newspaper The Times about him Toll additional that must be faced by those women converted into currency for their relatives. The response from the government of London, whose foreign minister, Jeremy Hunt, has limited to promise to investigate the matter, implies a guarantee to the British newspaper when it says that the victims were first informed that they should pay afterwards for the effort of his rescue. The savings, family and friends connections or, in the absence of money, the request for a loan, are the solutions that those responsible for British diplomacy offered to these rescued women, although punished again by unexpected economic pressure,
The policy that in practice runs the government of the conservative Theresa May – to save money and based on loans to the rescued victims – contrasts with its publicized vocation to tackle the phenomenon of forced marriages. In the last three years, the police record in the United Kingdom has seen more than 3,500 cases, considered a form of modern slavery and difficult to detect when circumscribed to the family and private sphere.
The official figures barely scratch the magnitude of the phenomenon, but the investigation of The Times Yes, it is clear that escaping this cycle with the help of the British government implies a tremendous additional burden. Similar to the contract with a bank (and its payment obligations), which contract women released, for example, from their entry into a "correctional" Somalia that sought their submission or a forced marriage in Bangladesh branded by the British legislation of modern slavery. That the government itself helps to free itself from these chains implies, however, a payment