Question: His training was focused from the beginning towards the world of business. Why?
Answer: The origin was casual. Like many young people, I was not sure what to study and "economic" seemed to be a versatile option. The economics career has little of the scope of knowledge of the company and, really, I was not excited.
However, during the race, I was fortunate to work in a business school at the University and I got a Master in Business Administration when I finished my degree. That was really where I entered the field of business knowledge and I liked that one. Suddenly, I found business management application to everything around me. If I entered a restaurant, I saw the operative part, I made numbers to see more or less how easy or difficult to make money with it, I wondered how it was the management of people or inventories … The same if I entered a bank branch , or to an appliance store. Everyone was looking for the operating model and how they came to make the numbers in their income statements.
P: And it passed through the prestigious MIT. How did he get it? What did he do in that center?
A: The company I work for selected me for an internal talent program. They identified people with outstanding performance, initiative and ability to drive change. I then entered a development program that included training at MIT. Specifically, what we did was train in innovation methodologies. And training in innovation at MIT is a luxury, really.
P: Does it really know where the future world will go?
A: Of course. MIT is possibly the epicenter of research and education in the world that has a greater relationship with the company. From its origin it was conceived as a university that responded to the rapid growth of technology and science. Two centuries after that conception they continue fulfilling their mission being the first. Those who are at the forefront, those who anticipate where we are going. MIT is one of the centers with the greatest focus on innovation and entrepreneurship.
Although there are also other poles. Given the question of “where the future world will go”, a new non-accredited University (not more than 10 years old) that came to me at the Nasa Research Park in California, the “Singularity University”, has come to mind . The "singularity theory" states that emerging technologies, such as nanotechnology and biotechnology, will massively increase human intelligence in the next two decades and that this will give a drastic change to the world economy. Kurzweil, the father of this theory and one of the founders of the University, says that 100 years of progress in the 21st century will be equivalent to 20,000 years and progress … In its classrooms it is about visualizing and anticipating this drastic change.
The objective of this University is «to gather, educate and inspire a group of leaders who strive to understand and facilitate the exponential development of technologies and to promote, apply, guide and guide these tools to solve the great challenges of humanity» I've been reviewing the contents of your programs for a long time so that, as soon as I can, participate in one. They say that who cares for one of them does not see the world again in the same way.
P: What attracts you so much about teaching to have dedicated to it when it does not seem to be a well paid sector?
A: I love teaching because I always combined it with professional practice in the company. You cannot teach something without first shelling it, understanding it, assimilating it, structuring it, synthesizing it. In my opinion, this deep understanding of the concepts makes you a better professional. And, at the same time, when that exercise of understanding is added to having put it into practice, the result as a teacher is also better. Combining theory with practice forms a virtuous circle that helps me to be both better professional and teaching. It is necessary that the academic and business world feed back.
P: As an Organizational Development consultant she has worked as several multinationals. Are monsters difficult to change?
A: In general the answer is yes. Although it always depends on the changes you want to make and the resources you dedicate. Changes in large companies need the management team to be involved and create 100% change. It is also necessary that they allocate the necessary resources. This seems so obvious, it is not so usual. Resources in companies are limited and the management team is not always aligned. It is necessary to reconcile many wills and interests. It is not simple.
P: How are foreign and Spanish companies different?
A: More than if the origin of the capital is Spanish or foreign, what makes the difference is the geographical situation of the company. Imagine a Spanish company in China. Why culture will be governed? If you want to work, for the Chinese. Definitely. The difference and the challenge lie in that. In cultural differences between countries. In my case I can compare between Spain, the United States and Chile. The behaviors, the way to negotiate, to communicate, the schedules, etc., are completely different.
P: He collaborated with an NGO in Peru. What motivated you personally?
A: This comes from far back. Already at the University I did it with a small NGO volunteering in Madrid. We also had (and still have) projects in Peru, Mozambique and Bolivia and helped in Peru's projects from Madrid in the search for funding, in the preparation of project documentation, in accounting … I could never finance the trip until I started working and that was when I was able to get to know the projects in situ. In San José de Tiabaya, very close to Arequipa we have a crib house, a dining room for the elderly and a center for the disabled. I was very excited to meet and work live in what I had been collaborating for a long time.
P: The move to another important entity in the United States seems like another radical change. What moved him?
A: From Chile we spent a year in Spain but we still wanted to go abroad. We already had two children and we wanted to give them the opportunity to learn a language from an early age. Again we look for mobility and this time, we were hired by a company directly in Miami. And here we are since 2011.
P: How do you live in the United States?
A: Although with common patterns, within the United States there are very different lifestyles. In 2001 I was living in Saint Louis (Missouri) and now I am in Miami. Two cities that have nothing to do. As if you compare with NY, or San Francisco … In my case, in the two experiences in the United States, life is much quieter than in Spain. It gets less. You live more in houses than in the street as we do in Spain. Everything happens in earlier hours. Here in Miami, life, in addition to the good weather, is marked by multiculturalism. In Miami, there are many people who are passing through. Not only from Latin America, but almost everywhere.
P: Have you sacrificed much your personal life for the professional?
A: I don't feel that way at all. Work is part of life, isn't it? At least for me, working is normal. But it is not the only thing I do. I have my family and friends with whom I share time, I like to play sports, leisure … And yes. I would like to have more time for all those things. Who does not? But from there to feel that I am sacrificing something, the truth is that no.
. (tagsToTranslate) companies