Six years after being indicted in the Argentine complaint and having expressed his willingness to testify, Rodolfo Martín Villa has sat in front of Judge María Servini. He did it 11,000 kilometers from her, who was in Buenos Aires, by videoconference from the Argentine embassy.
The voice of relatives and victims: “The support for Martín Villa is a desperate attempt to influence the judge”
The former minister entered the Argentine embassy in Madrid at around three thirty in the afternoon. Several witnesses claim to have seen his car leave, driven by his driver, but without him inside, twenty minutes later. Sources consulted by elDiario.es indicate that he began to testify around six in the afternoon, answering questions from the prosecution and therefore not limiting himself to delivering the forty-page written statement that he had previously sent to the magistrate of the Argentine lawsuit María de Servini, and to which this newspaper had access.
The start of the statement has been delayed because a reading of part of the summary and of the charges against him has previously been made.
It is not ruled out that the taking of the investigative statement will continue this Friday or next Monday. In fact, when the Argentine magistrate María de Servini planned to travel to Madrid in September 2019, to take a statement in person from Martín Villa, she fixed five or six days of stay in the Spanish capital, anticipating that the investigation could even be extended several days. Finally that trip was suspended due to the holding of elections in Argentina.
The former Minister of the Interior declares before the judge of the Argentine complaint of his own free will, since the Council of Ministers operated in his day to prevent the interrogations of the people accused in this case promoted from Argentina that investigates crimes against humanity of the Francoism.
“Falsehoods and errors in the complaint”
In the text delivered to the judge, Martín Villa highlights his “collaboration with justice”, and attacks what he describes as “falsehoods and errors of the complaint” against him, accused of crimes of aggravated homicide in a context of crimes against The humanity. The Argentine justice has been seeking the high Francoist official since 2014 for 12 homicides, crimes against humanity committed in a “systematic attack” to eliminate opponents. How the “massacre” of Vitoria 1976, murders committed by far-rightists or the events of Sanfermines 1978.
Regarding these deaths, the one who was a minister during the Franco regime and the Transition emphasizes that “there were errors, serious errors, and police behavior contrary to respect for the rights of the people and therefore it is legitimate to demand just reparation”, but considers that “One thing is to acknowledge the pain of the victims and the need for reparation and another is to accept an account of what happened that leads to even affirming that what happened in Vitoria constituted genocide and crimes against humanity.”
According to his account, “it could happen that the policemen and civil guards whose shots caused the deaths acted in obedience to instructions issued or consented to by me. It was not like that.” In fact, he emphasizes that “when it was asked whether I could be politically responsible for certain police actions or deserved to be politically disapproved” the Chambers that emerged from the 1977 elections rejected it.
“It did not happen, as the complaint says, a systematic and generalized plan to terrorize the Spanish in favor of the representative form of government through the physical elimination of its most representative exponents (…) the Transition was the opposite. the first time in 200 years the prisons were emptied of political prisoners and the world without Spanish exiles “.