Only the information about Villarejo, Cospedal, the envelopes and the Barbas interrupt the placidity in which Mariano Rajoy has lived since 2018, when a motion of censure derived from the conviction of the PP by Gürtel evicted him from the Presidency of the Government. Until today, October 2, when he has reappeared at the La Toja Forum in A Toxa (O Grove, Pontevedra) to blame the cabinet of his successor, Pedro Sánchez, the responsibility for the parties and administrations not to reach agreements to combat the pandemic of coronavirus. And tell the respectable, Granada shows bipartisanship and finance, who never received the fine for skipping confinement.
Felipe VI assures that the crisis linked to COVID is a “transformation opportunity” for the economy
The mentioned intervention of Rajoy took place in a round table of title Europe’s response, which the former president shared with another former, the Italian Enrico Letta, and with the Bulgarian liberal political scientist Iván Krastev, moderated by the analyst Ignacio Torreblanca. And it was not exactly right, although it was prepared. In the midst of more or less in-depth speeches about the being and the future of the European Union – and on which Rajoy contributed information of interest – he picked up with a lesson on epidemic management.
“At the beginning there was a poor assessment of risk,” he began his speech, “we saw what was happening in China or Italy and we issued messages of excessive calm.” Rajoy nevertheless considered the declaration of the state of alarm to be correct and, from there, summarized his particularities in four points what to do for these occasions. “The first thing is to get the diagnosis right. Because the ignored reality ends up taking its revenge, “said who became famous for his tendency to allow a more than prudential time to pass between the emergence of problems and the action to solve them. Then he continued with a praise for the importance of “being prepared.” “At times like this it is when you see if a country is good, bad or regular,” he added, and referred explicitly to health, as if it did not suffer unprecedented cuts and precariousness under his mandate. He also recommended seeking “the complicity of the people” for the measures to be adopted, “even if it is very difficult.” And he ended with his thickest accusation: “You have to agree. The situation is extremely difficult and it is not acceptable that there is no agreement with so many deaths ”.
What, at first, could seem like a Solomonic admonition to bipartisanship – so well represented in the conclave organized by Hotusa in the Illa da Toxa, in the Rías Baixas – or even a certain criticism of Isabel Díaz Ayuso and her refusal to protect health public of Madrid, was in fact a frontal critic to the Government of PSOE and Podemos. She immediately clarified it: “The greatest responsibility for the agreement belongs to whoever has the highest responsibility. And for that you have to put in hours ”. The only concession to that reality that, he said, always takes its revenge was a “we must admit that this is not easy.”
From Guindos and Rajoy Keynesianos
Once the accounts of the political news were settled, the debate focused on the object of its epigraph. It was significant to hear a certain rewriting of what happened in the community instances during the 2012 crisis, especially by Rajoy, who also supported the Keynesianism that Luis de Guindos, former Minister of Economy of the PP and vice president of the European Central Bank. “De Guindos speaks of the need for an expansive economic policy, public spending but with sense, and he is right,” he said.
The former Prime Minister between 2011 and 2018 also related how in his day he had tried to convince Angela Merkel that the EU countries lived not only to control the public deficit and contain the exterior. “I agreed with that. Merkel is on the right, like me. But they had to give us something else. And there was not a single euro in Europe ”, she affirmed,“ it was a whole against all. So it was very difficult to make decisions in favor of the people ”. Enrico Letta endorsed his version, of course, with a more elaborate speech in Italian and, in his case, given that he was prime minister for the center left, a little, just a little, less surprising. Because Rajoy 2020, which seemed almost to speak like an envoy from Syriza at the end of 2015 to Brussels, finished off with a “there is nothing worse than a doctrinaire, not even a sectarian”, who knows if directed, in a deferred, to Wolfang Schäuble.
But the former president could not resist the temptation to return to the Spanish stage in his last intervention, facilitated by the moderator who changed shifts to give him the closure. He did so with some rhetorical and even a little extemporaneous phrases in which he declared his support – which nobody had really doubted – “for the Constitution, reconciliation between Spaniards, the Monarchy and the institutions.” A loud applause from the audience, including Felipe González, Ana Pastor and Alberto Núñez Feijóo, received his oath of loyalty to the current order and closed the table.