Let's close the Senate and go on a pilgrimage

ef

This attitude, similar to that of a child who, when angry, prefers to take the ball rather than solve the problem, defines Mr. Clavijo's conception of politics.

The XIV Legislature of the Courts of the Kingdom of Spain will go down in the annals of the history of our country as one of the most complex and full of unexpected events, although it is already known that in politics you cannot choose the circumstances in which to act. front, but the attitude to adopt before them. The pandemic, the La Palma volcano and the war in Ukraine are just some of the unforeseen unforeseen events on which, from Congress and Senate, we have had to legislate suddenly, with the approval of social protection mechanisms never seen before. But, on a much smaller scale, it has also been the legislature in which the Spanish parliamentarism has discovered Fernando Clavijo and his innovative ideas.

On rare occasions, a worker advocates for removal from their job. Much less in an interview in RNE and with a proven history of absenteeism from work. Fernando Clavijo surprised us all when, in the same week in which he missed a plenary session of the Senate (September 7) to attend the Romería del Pino, but not before deceiving the güimareros, to whom he addressed via Twitter writing to them "that he could not be at the Socorro descent because his attendance at the plenary session, which he did not attend, prevented him from doing so," he requested the closure of the Upper House. I admit that, having heard the argument that the senator uses, I can only praise his bravery and flatly reject his conclusions.

From variable geometry to normality

Clavijo explains that his parliamentary work has "zero reflection" and that "as much as you have the interest to carry out that work and that it bears fruit, in the end you end up being discouraged [porque te lo votan en contra]». It is undoubtedly novel, as I said, that a person who has been a mayor, a regional parliamentarian, a regional president and now a senator is unaware of the roles that the parliamentary majority and minority have in our political system.

When the Senate rejects a motion, an amendment, or a bill introduced by the opposition, it is not throwing out or impeding anyone's work. It is exercising the popular will that the citizens expressed in the last general elections. It is the duty of senators to do exactly that: transfer the electoral result to each parliamentary initiative. And the obligation of citizens in the next elections to assess the position that their representatives had in each vote and in each initiative presented.

Unable to form a majority, he went to the Senate instead of opposing Ángel Víctor Torres

Senator Clavijo's criticism would, in my opinion, have an iota of reason if in both chambers a political party had an absolute majority that summarily rejected any alternative debate and project to its own. But it's not like that. One of the characteristics of this legislature is that the Government of Spain and the Socialist Parliamentary Group have relied on heterodox and heterogeneous majorities for each project. What used to be called variable geometry is now normality.

The incapacity of Senator Clavijo

In my opinion, Senator Clavijo wants to transfer his inability to reach majorities to the existence of the Senate, instead of questioning his political ability to agree with those who do not think exactly like him. A behavior similar to what we experienced in the formation of the Government of the Canary Islands in 2019: unable to form a majority, he went to the Senate instead of exercising opposition to Ángel Víctor Torres who dictated the polls. Given that in the situation in which he finds himself there is no higher instance to which he can flee, and knowing that his appraisal is not in danger because of his request, he now advocates closing the chamber.

This attitude, similar to that of a child who, when angry, prefers to take the ball rather than solve the problem, defines Mr. Clavijo's conception of politics. For almost all of the representatives with whom I have met and worked, politics is a mechanism with which, by debating and reaching agreements and commitments, we build a better society. For Senator Clavijo it is the exercise of power. Either what he considers is done or, in his own words, "the Canary Islands are attacked", "the Canary Islands are insulted" or "the Canary Islands are betrayed". A patrimonialization that encompasses not only the concept of the Canary Islands, but also the exercise of power, and that is opposed to the basic democratic concepts of government and opposition.

The seat occupied by Senator Clavijo is useful and relevant

In order to debate Mr. Clavijo's arguments more specifically, I would like to tell him about the use we made of the camera in the plenary session in the first week of September. On Wednesday, September 7, almost at the same time that the offering to the Virgen del Pino began, we approved a modification of the Penal Code that toughens the penalties for reckless driving of motor vehicles or mopeds, and in the gallery They found associations of cyclists from all over Spain who applauded the initiative for obvious reasons. Senator Clavijo could have supported or rejected the project, intervened to amend it or veto it. In short, he will act as a representative of the Canarian people. But instead he preferred to play the respectable role of rosemary. We also discussed in that same plenary session the principle of equity in scholarships and energy saving measures, among other issues, without taking into account the senator's contributions.

The seat occupied by Senator Clavijo, contrary to what he thinks, is useful and relevant

Contrary to what he thinks, the seat occupied by Senator Clavijo is useful and relevant. Being appointed by the Canarian Parliament on behalf of the entire Canary Islands and not just one island, he is the clearest expression of the representation of the Canary Islands in the territorial chamber. If due to his absences, his incapacity or for whatever reason, Clavijo considers that the Senate has no reason to exist, for consistency, perhaps he should consider giving up his seat to another party comrade. He himself is aware of the longing that in Tenerife (and increasingly in other islands) his seat generates. Of course, this humble senator would ask the Canarian Coalition that, in its next internal election for the position, propose someone who complies with the obligation to attend the plenary sessions of the Senate, ex art. 20 of its Regulations, instead of going on a pilgrimage, without prejudice to the respect that they deserve.

Source link