Tue. Aug 20th, 2019

Italy fines Calatrava with 78,000 euros for the bridge he designed in Venice



The Court of Accounts of Venice has condemned the Valencian architect Santiago
Calatrava to pay almost 78,000 euros for a series of errors that made more expensive the construction of the Constitution Bridge of the city of canals.

The errors in the Calatrava project, the judges write, constitute a “macroscopic
negligence”, Because they provoked price increase of the project, which has had to be modified several times since its inauguration.

The court has sentenced the architect on appeal, after his first degree acquittal, to pay 77,969.74 euros to the treasury
public of Venice after the cost of its controversial bridge, inaugurated in the year 2008, because of a series of errors in your project.





Next to him has also been sentenced to pay 10,989.73 euros the engineer from Venice, Salvatore
Vento. Both must also meet the costs of the process in the second instance, amounting to 7,267.81 euros.


The Italian engineer Salvatore Vento will also have to pay 10,989 euros

The judgment, which is dated August 6, indicates that the work finally cost 11.6 million of euros front to the 7 million
planned initially.

This is "even more serious" because the work was assigned to an "esteemed professional of world-wide reputation and of very high competence, with a long and proven experience in the construction of bridges", reads.


The work cost 11.6 million euros, and was expected to cost 7 million

The Constitution Bridge It was built to link the railway station of St. lucia with the Square
Rome, where vehicles that arrive in the city are parked by their only land route.

This infrastructure from the beginning was involved in problems, delays Y controversial and has required several changes, such as the glass lastras of its floor by stone to avoid slips or the introduction of elements to improve its accessibility to people in wheelchairs.

In 2015 the Venetian Court of Accounts there was
acquitted to the architect of an assumption crime of extra costs of the bridge.






The bridge has required changes from the start, such as the glass floor to avoid slipping








Source link