Isa Serra, spokesperson for Unidas Podemos in the Madrid Assembly, has appealed to the Supreme Court the sentence that last April sentenced her to 19 months in jail for separate offenses and minor injuries for their participation in the attempt to stop an eviction in 2014.
Isa Serra, sentenced to 19 months in prison for a crime of attack and minor injuries in a protest against eviction
In his brief, he alleges that the ruling of the Madrid Superior Court of Justice (TSJM) violates his right to the presumption of innocence and is “arbitrary”, based “exclusively” on the “vague and imprecise” statements of Municipal Police officers that the they charged. Her lawyers argue that her testimony and that of the witnesses proposed by her defense were not valued despite the fact that her version agrees with the graphic material provided.
That is why they demand that the High Court review all the evidence and not just the ruling. The appeal emphasizes that the “abundant evidentiary material” that demonstrates the “innocence” of the Podemos spokesperson has not been “rationally” assessed and ensures that none of the 115 videos and almost a hundred photographs contributed show Serra in attitude “belligerent or violent”, but is “calm”, “without shouting” and “avoiding conflict”.
However, the judges considered that Serra was part of the group of people who, at the end of the eviction, “accused and insulted” the police officers who were carrying out the eviction. During the trial, several officials who appeared as witnesses at the proposal of the Prosecutor General’s Office claimed that the deputy – who was not a public official at the time – did attack them and even two of them declared that she was “particularly angry” with them because of their status as women.
“The accused, integrating herself into groups of people, since sometimes she was in one of the cords and other times in the other, who rebuked, insulted and harassed the agents, made insults directed at the agents in general, as well as in Particular to a Municipal Police officer, saying: ‘You are a cocaine addict’, ‘bad mother, motherfucker, with all that we women have fought, with you you lose everything, you and your own companions do not love you’, collects the ruling.
The regional deputy has always maintained that the accusations are “false”, “lack evidence” and that, consequently, the sentence is “unjust”. His lawyers give total relevance to the fact that the police complaint about these events was not presented until twenty days after the eviction occurred and after being shown photographs of Serra. In fact, it was not until that moment that the municipal police officers saw photographs of those involved in the protest for recognition.
The sentence also states that Serra threw “blunt” objects and that he “shoved” the police. In the appeal, his defense refutes these facts and affirms that they are not supported by any testimony or graphic evidence. In this sense, his lawyers reject that these actions are imputed to the deputy for his mere presence at the concentration and recall that the jurisprudence has established that the mere presence or integration in a group is not enough to punish a person for the actions of third
The events date back to January 31, 2014, when Serra was not yet a public official. The now deputy then participated in the attempt to stop the eviction of a man with a great disability who lived alone and could not afford the rent demanded by her landlord.