The delegated executive committee of the board of directors of Iberdrola has agreed to make the “administrators and employees” of the electricity company, which includes its president, Ignacio Sánchez Galán, at the disposal of the Central Court of Instruction number 6 of the National Court, so that be summoned to testify in the Villarejo case to in order to “facilitate the completion” of the investigation and tackle the “constant suspicions” hanging over the company in this matter.
This movement, which has been disseminated through a relevant event to the National Securities Market Commission (CNMV) that conveys the brief that Iberdrola has submitted to the National Court, occurs at a time when the Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office is studying the summons of Galán as investigated to clarify his knowledge of the orders to commissioner José Manuel Villarejo for which the electricity company paid just over one million euros.
According to the fiscal and legal sources consulted by this newspaper, the decision has not been taken, although it is considered a natural step to call the president of the company, as has been done in other lines of investigation of the cause that affect large companies , to interrogate him, on the one hand, about Iberdrola’s supervision policies with suppliers and, on the other, about the extent to which he was informed of the type of jobs that his then head of Security, Antonio Asenjo, was hiring and, above all, if he knew who I was doing them.
In its brief, Iberdrola argues that the processing of this separate piece, number 17 of the Tandem macrocause, has meant “significant reputational erosion” and has been “taken advantage of by competitors” to “directly or indirectly” attack “the good name of the company”.
“These statements and information, outside the interests of the Justice, have been aimed at spreading suspicions about the company and about some of its directors and administrators. Such performances would come actually responding to a clear smear strategy motivated by spurious interests of some ex-executives and competitors that only intend to harm ”, indicates the relevant fact.
Consequently, and after having carried out internal audits and provided documentation to the court, Iberdrola now decides «for the best protection of the corporate interest, based on the confirmation of the conclusions reached in the internal investigations», to put «to the administrators and employees of the Company at the disposal of the Central Investigating Court No. 6 so that, insofar as it deems necessary and as soon as possible, appear to provide your testimony. Said internal investigations refer to the ‘forensic’ report commissioned from PwC to elucidate the scope of the contracts with Cenyt, the Villarejo company.
This ‘forensic’, adds the company, did not find evidence that the contracting, accounting and payments have “violated the established control procedures, nor, finally, Indications that allow linking third parties outside the Security and Administration and Control directorates with the hiring investigated ». In other words, as usual in the rest of the pieces involving Ibex 35 companies (BBVA, Caixabank, Repsol), the heads of these departments are targeted.
The investigation into Iberdrola’s orders to Commissioner Villarejo, which involved payments of just over one million euros staggered over a decade, began in November 2019, although the first information in this regard emerged in May 2018, when the audios that the controversial police command began to come to light
had recorded of their conversations with the one who was head of Security of the electricity company, Antonio Asenjo.
In total, as the energy company recalls, there are 17 contracts with Cenyt; These include Iberdrola, corresponding to the years 2004 to 2009, and Iberdrola Renovables Energía, corresponding to the years 2012 and 2017. Furthermore, the aforementioned internal investigations launched by the firm found that the relationship with Villarejo is limited exclusively to those 17 commissions with their consequent invoices.
Both Asenjo and Villarejo are being investigated for bribery and disclosure of secrets, just as executives such as Juan Carlos Rebollo and former directors such as José Antonio Del Olmo are accused. not so Iberdrola as a legal person nor its chairman.