June 21, 2021

Francisco González calls “frivolous” accusations “so serious” to his person for the “Villarejo case”


MADRID

Updated:

save

The former president of BBVA Francisco González calls “frivolous” the “absolute lack of rigor” in the “so serious” accusations made on his person, the «Total absence» of evidence that supports them and the «inexplicable»Lack of legal arguments.

This is stated by Gonzalez in a statement sent to Europa Press a few days after the summary of the separate piece number 9 of the Tandem case, in which he is being investigated for alleged bribery offenses and disclosure of secrets for contracts between the entity bank and retired commissioner José Manuel Villarejo for 13 years and for an amount exceeding 10 million euros.

«González wants to express his utmost outrage and surprise at the intolerable aggression he is suffering due to the lightness and frivolity of the accusations made on his person», The statement said.

As the former president of BBVA explains, there is an “absolute” lack of rigor in the accusations. Based on what is known in the summary, he believes that the Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s brief is based on «Simple clues and even mere conjecture, as well as in opinions and statements of third parties, who are in a position to defend their own personal situation ».

In this regard, he emphasizes that he has always shown his «total»Willingness to act with full transparency in this procedure and, he adds, was the only person who voluntarily did not accept his right not to declare because the summary was kept secret – as was BBVA.

González recalls that he voluntarily attended the National Court on November 18, giving a “complete and detailed” answer to the questions of the investigating judge Manuel García Castellón, and the anti-corruption prosecutors Miguel Serrano and Ignacio Stampa.

In the brief sent, González remarks his confidence in Justice and ensures that he will continue to collaborate with any new petition within the framework of the instruction, even if the secret has been lifted.

Blame Corrochano

In this order of things, Gonzalez wanted to highlight some points of his statement, such as «Never» was aware of the hiring of Cenyt or that it was from the commissioner Villarejo. The former president of the bank based in La Vela says he knew nothing until May 2018, when he met him through what was published in a media outlet.

It was precisely at this time when he promoted an internal investigation within BBVA to know the scope of these supposed works.

González has reiterated on numerous occasions that he never intervened or knew any details of the hiring of this detective company, neither in 2004, when Sacyr attempted to assault the bank, nor when he was hired again in later years to recover real estate assets that had debts with the bank.

«The hiring of Cenyt It was the responsibility of the Director of Security, Julio Corrochano, who was the one who was responsible for making this decision, ”González said in the statement.

If he had knowledge that the hiring of this company was illegal, the former banker adds that “he would never have allowed it.” That is, if there were any irregularities, it was done behind their backs.

He also points out that “Never” ordered anyone to hire any detective company for these research papers and, if applicable, if he was informed by any of the bank executives that a company was going to be hired, his only comment would have been to contact the Director of Security, since that was part of your responsibility

González contradicts Béjar

His statement contradicts that of former director and former president of the Castellana Norte District (DCN) Antonio Béjar, who acknowledged in his judicial statement before the judge that González told him personally, during a meeting in his office, that they should hire for an investigation to unpaid the company said by the bank’s security chief, Julio Corrochano, which turned out to be Cenyt, the firm of Villarejo.

The hiring of Cenyt, a company whose name González did not contribute to Béjar in the aforementioned meeting, was carried out after the bank did not obtain the results that the then president expected with another different agency, Kroll, which was signed through the British firm Simons & Simons at the proposal of José Ignacio Goirigolzarri, at that time CEO of the entity.

.



Source link