Every eleven minutes a person on the dependency waiting list dies


46,671 people died last year waiting for a dependency benefit. There are 128 a month, more than five every day and one every eleven minutes. It is the count made by the Association of Directors and Managers of Social Services, which has made this Friday balance of 2021 after publishing the IMSERSO the December data related to the System for Autonomy and Dependency Care (SAAD). There are some signs that point to an improvement in coverage and a reactivation of the system after the collapse in which it has been mired for years, but even so it has not met the goal of reducing the waiting list marked by the Government and the autonomous communities.


The Government proposes that residences for the elderly have a maximum of 50 places

The Government proposes that residences for the elderly have a maximum of 50 places

Know more

People who died “in the bureaucratic labyrinth of the law” include those who are in the so-called “limbo of dependency” (28,192), which are those who have been recognized as entitled to the benefit, but not yet they have been granted; and another 18,479 people who have submitted an application but are pending evaluation, that is, they are not yet qualified in one of the possible grades.

The balance of 2021 also leaves a decrease in the waiting lists, which in other exercises have increased, but does not reach the level set as a goal by the Ministry of Social Rights and the autonomous communities on April 30, as part of the Plan of Shock they agreed. The measures were aimed at reducing the waiting list “by 60,000 people”, specifically the so-called “dependency limbo” before 2022, but it has finally been reduced by 38,807 people from 232,243 at the end of 2020 to 193,436 , 16.7% less.

Catalonia, the Canary Islands and La Rioja increase the limbo of dependency

“The Shock Plan did not arrive in time for the people who died last year,” denounces the association, which calls for “urgent measures to prevent the suffering and abandonment of the most vulnerable people in our country” because “at this rate It would take five years to achieve full attention”.

The association refers to “the bureaucracy in the procedures” and the data of three autonomous communities, in which the number of people in the “limbo of dependency” has grown as those responsible for “the objective not being achieved.” They are the Canary Islands (+23.1%), La Rioja (16.4%) and Catalonia (+7%).

On the other hand, there are communities that have met the objective and significantly reduced the waiting list: in Madrid there is up to 62.9% less and 42.2% in Aragón, while Castilla-La Mancha, Asturias and Andalusia exceed the 30% reduction. Even so, without comparing with a year earlier, the communities with the least number of people pending receiving the benefit to which they are entitled are Castilla y León, Castilla-La Mancha and Galicia, according to the association’s publication.

If other categories are added to the “dependence limbo” that bring together people who have not yet seen their right recognized, there are 392,690 awaiting proceedings, denounces the association: the 193,436 in limbo, 124,596 still pending resolution, 30,000 people who have applied, but have not yet been “recorded” in the system and another 44,658 who have been assessed, have been granted a specific benefit, but it is not yet effective.

There are some positive data that guarantee that “the system is reactivated”, believes the association, among them that the number of beneficiaries with benefit increases by 97,912, 8.71% more than in 2020; and in some communities such as the Valencian Community, Madrid or Asturias they have increased by more than 14%. But even so, the association demands a greater effort and that the activation does not take place based on “low cost” services for minor dependents. And it is that the places of residences and day centers have not yet recovered the levels prior to the pandemic.

“The Government of Spain and the Autonomous Governments must undertake reforms that speed up the procedures. It is necessary to simplify the procedures and apply suspension measures and flexibility of the service or provision without the need to resolve a new procedure,” the association asks.

.



Source link