'Doctor in Alaska' for millennials and twitterers | TV

'Doctor in Alaska' for millennials and twitterers | TV



It literally turned my heart (which I confused with angina pectoris) when I read it came back Doctor in Alaska, foundation of my sentimental education. I would not be who I am if I had not spent so many early mornings glued to the TV in a dark room watching the days of Cicely. But the illusion lasted me very little. As in that of Heraclitus, no one is immersed twice in the same series: neither she nor the spectator are the same.

It was not only the fear of facing the romantic idiocy of my adolescence, but the conviction that there is no place to Doctor in Alaska today. The series was canceled in 1995 and speaks of something that sounds bizarre in the 21st century: the sincere acceptance of the other. The characters are not saints nor aspire to any perfection, but neither are they cynical or antiheroes. They are misfits who have found in the ass of the world a place where nobody judges them. The grace of Cicely, something that is so difficult for him to understand the neurotic Doctor Fleischman, is that each one knows how strange and far removed from the slightest virtue, but he accepts it without complexes.

In 2018, that idea is almost subversive. That people live reconciled with their moral contradictions and dilemmas, without anyone tampering with them or trying to reform them, is unthinkable in times of morals and didactisms. If cynical characters abound in contemporary fiction, it is because we only accept moral ambiguity if it is presented in that shell. Then yes. Then we can breathe easy because we know that character is lost and can afford to be bad or not be all good. But I am not sure that the new inquisitors swallow that there are good people who are not virtuous or who the lack of virtue does not give a damn. I do not know if in 2018 we understand that you can live in peace with your darkest areas, without any tweeter threatens you or any deputy spits you out.

.



Source link