Sat. Apr 20th, 2019

Dismantling Garoña and the Waste Plan, challenges of the renewed Nuclear Council

Dismantling Garoña and the Waste Plan, challenges of the renewed Nuclear Council

The new Plenary of the Nuclear Safety Council (CSN) will face multiple challenges over the next 6 years, including the dismantling of the Garoña nuclear power plant and the renewal of the Radioactive Waste Management Plan, a key element for the closure of nuclear power plants set at 2035

Sponsored Ads

Advertise Here

The new plenary session, with majority of the PSOE, is chaired by Josep María Serena i Sender who is accompanied by Elvira Romera Gutiérrez, María Pilar Lucio Carrasco and Francisco Castejón Magaña, the latter at the proposal of Podemos, as new counselors and counselor of this body, to which Javier Dies of the PP joins (the renewal has only affected 4 of 5 councilors).

In statements to Efeverde Raquel Montón, responsible for the nuclear campaign of Greenpeace, explained that the new members face a six-year term with a "huge number of tasks" and has highlighted the expiration of the licenses of the 7 reactors: Almaraz (2 ), Ascó (2), Cofrentes (1), Vandellós (1) and Trillo (1).

"Beyond the fulfillment of the Government's plans for the extension of life of the reactors -according to the data of the Comprehensive National Plan for Climate and Energy 2020-2030-, all the licenses of the power plants are going to have to be revised or close them or to expand them ", detailed Montó.

The authorization for the uranium mine in Retortillo (Salamanca), the largest in Europe to open this element and immersed in multiple administrative controversies, also stands out among the security challenges, which should be addressed by the new Plenary, whose appointment published on March 30 in the BOE.

Although months ago the CSN already approved reports on the radiological and environmental impact on the mining project, and despite the fact that the last word on the mine falls to the Ministry for the Ecological Transition, the studies in which the CSN has to intervene are vital. for the plan the Australian company of Berkeley.

He pointed out that the Retortillo mine is a matter of great importance which, without a doubt, will put to the test if "this new Plenary has as a priority to protect the population and the environment from the harmful effects of radiation".

Another relevant issue is the VII General Plan for Radioactive Waste (PGRR), which will replace the current one (2006), and which must be presented, as soon as possible, by the National Company of Radioactive Waste (Enresa).

Before the approval of the PGRR, by the Government that results from the elections of 28-A, the aforementioned plan must undergo environmental assessments to be dealt with by Enresa and the Security Council.

Linked to the update of the PGRR is the construction of the Centralized Temporary Storage (ATC) of nuclear waste in Villar de Cañas (Cuenca), a silo in "serious legal and administrative stop" and in which during the last 6 years there has been advanced "nothing", the environmentalist has specified.

In his opinion, many aspects of the nuclear cemetery in Cuenca - currently suspended pending the update of the PGRR - have remained "in the air" and it is evident that the CSN will have to get back to it as soon as possible.

In spite of the multiple controversies in which the renewal of the president and the councilors has been involved, Montón, has assured "to have no doubt" about the legality of the process of appointment of the four councilors.

On this point, it has qualified that the last movements of the PP - the Supreme Court made appointments to the Nuclear Safety Council, which rejected it - only aim to generate a "political and media" debate to muddy the process.

Likewise, he has advocated transparency in this new stage that is now beginning and has lamented that during the last six years it has been a "dark and difficult" task to inform citizens and the media and has suggested a change in that line. It would be very healthy.


Source link

Leave a Reply