October 28, 2020

Discussion in Congress about the scope of the reform of the Criminal Code

Congress groups have engaged in a discussion on Tuesday about what should be the scope of the reform of the Criminal Code after the socialist spokeswoman, Adriana Lastra, announced yesterday that her party intends to include the apology and exaltation of Francoism as a crime.

The reform of the Code still does not reach Congress, it is not even known yet whether it will land as a bill at the proposal of the Government or as a bill at the request of a parliamentary group.

If a few days ago the discussion revolved around the modification of the type of sedition, so that it resembles what EU countries establish in this regard, and a little later on the criminalization of sexual assaults, this week the debate has focused in how to typify the apology of Francoism.

Lastra, at the end of the Board of Spokesmen, has indicated that if in Germany the one of Nazism is punished, in Spain the reflection on what to do before actions or expressions of exaltation of the dictatorship of Francisco Franco becomes “necessary.”

In his view, it is essential to “close” some of the fringes that did not finish suturing during the Transition, including ending “hate speech.” “This is the position of the PSOE and we will defend it with a lot of passion,” he said.

In United We can reasoning is similar. The parliamentary spokesman, Pablo Echenique, has also brought to light the example of Germany, a country in which he does not believe that freedom of expression is severed.

This has been reminded to the deputy of More Country, Íñigo Errejón, who a few hours earlier, in Congress, has questioned the proposal that yesterday launched the spokeswoman of the PSOE.

The ex-leader of Podemos has branded the “double-edged weapon” for whom “the Vox lords say many barbarities” that he does not share at all and would not advocate for his illegalization.

So the point of view between left forces is not the same. Errejón has shown his disagreement and the deputy of EH Bildu, Jon Iñarritu, has expressed some reluctance.

“It is time for the apology of Franco to be penalized,” he said after regretting that he himself, as a parliamentarian, has verified how the Government left without effect different requests to investigate acts of exaltation in that regard.

A predictable parliamentary ally of the PSOE as the PNV does not agree either, but not so much for the substance as for the form.

For his spokesman in Congress, Aitor Esteban, it is “washed away” the way in which the announcements on the reform of the Criminal Code follow one another.

His counterpart in ERC, Gabriel Rufián, however, has conveyed an unequivocal opinion, and thus, according to his words, “everything that is to eliminate remnants of the Franco dictatorship is positive.”

Clearly against the intentions of the Government and the PSOE are the PP and Vox.

The popular spokeswoman, Cayetana Álvarez de Toledo, sees “a maneuver” of the Socialist Party to “get Oriol Junqueras out of jail.”

Iván Espinosa de los Monteros has considered that the goal of the PSOE is to “regulate everything that can be thought of” and “limit what can be said”.


Source link