Death to the lukewarm | TV

Not surprisingly, Borja Sémper's goodbye to politics is less worrisome. I suppose that the fact that many of us who have regretted it have never voted for the PP fully explains Sémper's relocation to his own party. Something like that happened to Errejón in Podemos, which was much appreciated by the voters of other acronyms.

Beyond their similarities and differences, both are victims of a time of shouts and emotions. They waste telegeny, but a amortized telegenia. In a scenario full of hyperbole, stains on the chest, accusatory fingers, easy tears and fallacies ad hominem, who arises in the agora (and by agora we continue to understand the TV screen) from the calm, the argument, some elegance and a minimum intellectual height, is lost.

The terms of the debate were marked this week by the quarrel between Antonio Maestre and Isabel San Sebastián about a pin worn by the first in the Ana Rosa program. To highlight, you have to have the attitude of a school bully and the cursilery of a self-help writer.

We abuse comparisons with the interwar period to underline that we are living in a time of transition where new forms of fascism emerge. We often exaggerate the parallels, but reading these days M. The son of the century, Antonio Scurati, has again disturbed me the ease with which complex and modern nations fell under the shamanic spell of screamers and gossip. Scurati tells how Mussolini appealed to basic emotions, seeking empathy from the auditoriums. D'Annunzio, Marinetti and the speakers who raised fascism shouted that they did not want spectators, that it could only be for or against. That is, death of the lukewarm, first victims of emotional hysteria.

I hope the count stops here.


Source link