September 24, 2020

Csar Adrio, sentenced to 30 years in prison for the crime of Ana Enjamio – La Provincia

Two weeks after a popular court issued a guilty verdict against César Adrio for the murder, with cruelty and alevosía, of the young engineer Ana María Enjamio CarilloIn December 2016, in its portal on Madrid Avenue, the Vigo Hearing has imposed a sentence of 30 years in prison. According to the sentence, the man, a native of Vigo, killed the girl because of his feeling of machismo and domination over her. He faced a maximum of 32 requested by the private accusations and the Prosecutor’s Office.

The resolution of Section Five reflects that the defendant “delighted” with the suffering of the victim, to which he subjected “to a kind of torture” when he was “totally defenseless.”

The defendant was sentenced as the author of a crime of murder with alevosía and asañamento, the aggravating factors of gender and kinship, to the penalty of 25 years in prison; as the author of a crime of harassment, concurring the aggravating relationship, to the penalty of 20 months in jail; and as the author of a crime of violation of privacy, with the aggravating relationship, the three years and eight months in prison.

In addition, the Court imposed the prohibition to communicate and approach within 500 meters of parents and sibling of the victim for a period of more than 10 years to the prison sentence imposed. The judgment also agrees, in the event that an appeal is filed, to extend the defendant’s preventive detention up to half of the penalty imposed for the most serious crime condemned, that is, 12 years and 6 months in prison, counted from on December 21, 2016.

The defendant also he must compensate each of the parents of the victim with 87,900 and his brother with 25,400 euros. This resolution is not firm, since it is possible to appeal against it before the High Court of Justice of Galicia (TSXG). Adrio’s defense lawyer himself recognized after the decision of the popular jury his intention to appeal the ruling.

The magistrate recalls the compatibility of the aggravating application based on gender and kinship. “Gender should be applied in all those cases in which it is proven that the author committed the facts against the female victim for the mere fact of being one and with the intention of making clear his sense of superiority in front of her. On the contrary, the circumstance mixed relationship responds to obxectivable parameters directly or indirectly related to living together, “he emphasizes.

The magistrate indicates that, as the Jury said, the defendant “executed the death of the victim, considered hers and no one else”. For the application of the aggravating gender, he considers significant the manifestations of the condemned to his ex-girlfriend, to which he warned that he was not going to be with him, nor was there being with another young man. “That should infer the empowerment with which the accused felt about his victim,” emphasizes the judge.

The Jury Court considered that the condemned attacked his ex-partner in the portal with a knife and that acted “in a particularly perverse way, by behaving in an aleive manner and with the intention of causing him a particular and unnecessary harm”.

“Not only mobile and occasion to kill his ex-girlfriend, but a plurality of signs and data that come to place him as the material author of the death of that,” insists the magistrate president, who recalls in the resolution the “defenseless situation in which the victim was in front of his aggressor “. Thus, he refers to his physical superiority, to the confidence of the victim, “who did not expect such a reaction”, which made use of a weapon and which the girl “lacked the possibility of defending.”

“Following the conviction of the Jury Court concur that defendant’s special temperament of delighting in the suffering of the victim who was going to kill, “says the judge, who points out that the body presented esvarantes lesions on the skin, in the thorax, which are described as” threatening or probing injuries. “This way of acting , second is stated in the resolution, it reflects that the condemned, in addition to pursuing the end of the life of the girl, wanted to “cause him, in a deliberate way, a pain that went beyond that which accompanies a violent death, involving a kind of torture, behavior rather than improper of a human being, and that as a result of the victim’s refusal to maintain a relationship with the accused. ”


Source link