Saturday, Pride he ran into a conflict provoked by the presence of Ciudadanos, on foot after an orange banner, on the march in Madrid. There were shouts, insults, a peaceful sitting to prevent the passage of the party orange party that delayed the departure of the floats more than an hour and a half and some water, plastic bottles and empty beer cans. The police finally escorted the politicians out of the demonstration and dissolved the spontaneous sitting.
The parade started but the debate was not there, and the indignation, on both sides, either. The politicization of the day –that was coming in crescendo after the entrance of the extreme right to the municipal Government Y the statements of its leaders about the "denigration" of the celebration-, it was almost complete. "Proud and happy of the citizens' response to the proposals of the extreme right", pointed from Cogam, the collective of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transsexuals of Madrid and one of the organizers of the march, along with Felgtb, the Federation State of Lesbian, Gay, Transexual and Bisexual.
The controversy over whether to prevent the passage of Cs to the march was a sign of intolerance extended during that night and throughout Sunday. In social networks, various hashtags concerning what happened were trending topic for much of the day. Some, the majority, believe that the presence of Cs was looking for the conflict; others think that Pride should be inclusive without conditions; and all agree that violence is not allowed in any case.
From the Cogam they repeat it: "Obviously we do not approve of throwing away objects". They ensure that politicians have the right to speak "as anyone". "And people respond against what politicians do," they add. They think it was "clear" what was going to happen: "If you are a party, you go to a forum in defense of LGTBI and pactas rights with whom you want to cut them, it is normal that there are those who want to express that you are not welcome. "
There was for whom that was not so "normal", especially from politics. The mayor of Madrid, the popular Jose Luis Martinez-Almeida, claimed that (the Pride) "is moving from an inclusion party to a party of exclusion of those who do not think like certain people." Manuel Valls, councilor in Barcelona, also pronounced himself in that sense in your Twitter account: "Intolerance and violence are not admissible, even less in the demonstration. What happened deserves the most resounding condemnation of all. "
Within the LGTBI collective it is difficult to find reactions contrary to the boycott. A veteran activist who prefers to remain anonymous due to the "enormous polarization" that the debate has reached defends the inclusion of all: "I wish the PP would come (the PP also went to the demonstration in Madrid, although there was no incident with them. ). And the Episcopal Conference. And Vox. Maybe it would be the first step for them to understand the demands of the collective. Ignorance generates fear and rejection. "
However, as the Cogam, a large part of the LGTBI collective did not understand the presence of the politicians of the orange formation. For this part, the party only wanted to "provoke". Boti García, veteran of the movement in Madrid, answered the mayor of Madrid on his Twitter account: "Know that the Pride is not a party, but the visibility of the vindication of LGTBI collective rights".
And it illustrates it, anecdote through, the journalist Nerea Pérez, feminist activist and for the rights of the collective. "We had been two hours behind the sun in Atocha, we were wondering what was happening to avoid going out, and when we found out that it was a sit-in to prevent the passage of Ciudadanos, the merriment and the cheers of the car where I was riding were epic". Ensures that the consensus against this was absolute: "There are lines that can not be crossed, you can not be tolerant with people who negotiate with the extreme right, who is in favor of corrective therapies … It's strategy." One, he details, "very perverse." "They have the effrontery to make policies that harm the collective, to present themselves knowing what was going to happen and to become martyrs," he says. "It's not the first time they do it. Fortunately, the citizen response was there, and it's getting faster and faster. "
They call him The story of citizenship and a score of activists from different collectives, united for this action, organized to prevent the passage of Citizens in Pride. Dressed like the maids of Margaret Atwood, changing the color red for the orange, her action was "the spark" that ignited the sit-in that ended up taking Cs out of the parade. Explain that the action was a way to "plant face" at the entrance "to the institutions of the far right, facilitated by Citizens, and their instrumentalization of concepts such as 'freedom' to legitimize a demonstration where their policies are the reason for protest " And they insist: "We are not going to stop fighting".
(tagsToTranslate) controversial (t) boycott (t) citizens (t) paralyze (t) pride (t) movement (t) lgtbi (t) ask (t) match (t) orange (t) reflection (t) pact