March 8, 2021

Claudio Alonso considers a waste to implement trains in the Islands – La Provincia

“Implementing the train in Gran Canaria and Tenerife is a huge nonsense that must be avoided as it is.” This is how blunt Claudio Alonso, CEO of Grupo Domingo Alonso, who vehemently criticizes the proposal that the vice president of theCanary Government, Román Rodríguez, held Tuesday at the Iberian Press Forum, where he proposed solving the land mobility problems suffered by the capital islands through the railroad. “The almost 1.5 billion that this nonsense would cost would be a slab for the Canarian economy,” he says.

The manager remembers that when the GroupDomingo AlonsoHe was part of the Canarian Regional Federation of Car Importers and Car Dealers (Fredica) – which he left in October last year – already shared the position of the sector, which is contrary to the implementation of the train. “We are not opposed because we sell cars, but because we seek that the decisions taken by politicians are efficient and benefit the whole society. It makes no sense to perform this pharaonic work on an island that has a diameter of less than 100 kilometers.”

Alonso suggests deepening the debate on sustainable mobility and not making decisions lightly. “To begin, we must ask whether the mobility of the future is going to be collective or individual because what is clear is that it will be public,” he explains. The CEO of Grupo Domingo Alonso is convinced that alternatives to the train exist and are varied. For example, he defends that the technology will allow autonomous vehicles to be much more efficient thanks to Artificial Intelligence, which will control the routes that each citizen makes, which will allow a more direct and less polluting transport. In addition, the manager emphasizes that with the investment that the train would entail, free intercity routes in buses could be offered for 70 years to the users of this public transport.

Finally, Alonso recalls that environmentalists have also opposed this project due to the damage it would have to the territory and the high energy cost that would entail the construction of the necessary infrastructure for the train to circulate.


Source link