CelticTOIt is the second one that the Galician club emits in less than 24 hours
ANDThe Board of Directors of the RC Celta reissueda second statement to reiterate his discomfort with the arbitration of Gonzlez Fuertes.
"The RC Celta wants to reiterate, from the absolute tranquility and after a slow reflection,his absolute bewilderment and discomfort for the arbitration sufferedthis Saturday before Getafe, which offered totally incomprehensible decisions.
The club wonders if an arbitration act like the one of the past saturdaycan be forgotten without a minimum of reflection and analysisby those involved and if their severity is not greater, if possible, given the poor or no use of support and correction elements such as the VAR.
The club askswhat criteria can be applied to draw a penalty from Hugo MalloYwhy the referee was not warned from the VARof his manifest error.
The RC Celta wonders if in a play as tight as the out of play pointed to Hugo Mallo in the second celestial goal is a review of three minutes through the VAR when previously before the doubt was not out of play.Why were the lines not shown and in a later match was it done?.
He asks himselfwhy the referee did not show any of the infractions, some more than obvious, that Maxi Gmez sufferedand then the striker suffered the two fastest yellows in the history of this competition.
The club askswhy neither the referee nor the VAR were able to see the clear hand within the Flamini areaIn the second half. How is it possible that this move, clear and decisive, will go unnoticed ?.
The revision of the decisive plays of the party does not do if not to ratify the position of RC Celta, that was harmed of incomprehensible way, especially when the arbitration has technical elements like the VAR to correct clear and manifest errors like those suffered by the team light blue".