The Anticorruption Prosecutor’s Office requests that the former president of the Community of Madrid Ignacio González be sentenced to four years in prison in the piece of the Lezo case that investigates the award of the train to the town of Navalcarnero, according to the accusation brief to which elDiario has had access .is. For the bite that González received, Anticorrupción accuses him of a crime of passive bribery, but the highest request for conviction is for the businessman Javier López Madrid, then CEO of the construction company OHL, whom the Prosecutor’s Office accuses of active bribery and falsehood as a commercial document, for which he claims a six-year prison sentence. He says of both that they maintained “a close friendship relationship.”
Adrián de la Joya, testosterone in the twilight of the posh underworld
The Anti-Corruption brief ensures that OHL was awarded in 2007 with the award for the construction of the train to Navalcarnero thanks to “a plan devised” by the defendants Francisco Javier López Madrid – OHL counselor at the time of the events – and Rafael Arturo Martín of Nicolás Cañas – OHL’s General Director of National Construction – which consisted of winning the contract by presenting the lowest cost offer. This plan included that by means of a 2.5 million euro bite, the concession would be secured and also the subsequent modification of the project, with which they would compensate for the loss of income due to having submitted such a low offer. For Martín de Nicolás, Anticorrupción also requests six years in prison for the same crimes attributed to López Madrid.
On the other side of the corrupt plot were the aforementioned González, vice president of the Community of Madrid at that time and president of Canal de Isabel II, and Ildefonso de Miguel, managing director of the public water company. It was about both influencing the CEO of the public consortium Mintra, which was to grant the award of the Navalcarnero train. The alleged criminal plot is completed by another OHL charge, Felicísimo Damián Ramos, OHL Director of Management Control, and Adrián de la Joya and Ruiz de Velasco, historical Partner of Commissioner Villarejo residing in Switzerland.
Prosecutor Ana Cuenca details that Martín de Nicolás ordered Felicísimo Ramos to transfer 2.5 million from an OHL account at Banco Santander to bank accounts in Mexico in the name of the construction company a few days after the project was granted. At that point, Adrián de la Joya and one of his instrumental companies in Panama, Lauryn Group, enter the scene. This would issue two invoices to OHL for services that it never provided. The 2.5 million were deposited into an account in Switzerland of the company of Adrián de la Joya. The Prosecutor’s Office also highlights a “close relationship of friendship” between López Madrid and Villarejo’s partner.
Adrián de la Joya moved the money between different accounts of his property while withdrawing the 2.5 million in cash, which ended up in the hands of Ildefonso de Miguel for the distribution of commissions. “To date – writes Anticorrupción – it has not been possible to know the specific circumstances in which the distribution of these commissions between this defendant (De Miguel) and the defendant Ignacio González was carried out.”
For Rafael Arturo Martín de Nicolás, of OHL, the Prosecutor’s Office is requesting six and a half years in prison for active bribery and falsification of a commercial document, the same request for conviction for his subordinate, Felicísimo Damián Ramos. For his part, the former managing director of Canal Ildefonso de Miguel faces four years in prison for passive bribery, while Adrián de la Joya faces three and a half years for active bribery.
In its indictment, the Prosecutor’s Office requests that a long list of witnesses appear at the hearing, among which the former Minister of Labor stands out. Eduardo Zaplana, who appeared in the recordings of the Lezo case with González, or Juan Miguel Villar Mir, the owner of OHL against whom this case was filed in 2018 and who has just got rid of the imputation in pieces 8 and 9 of Punic, the latter on the irregular financing of the Madrid PP.